OVERLAP OF WWW.CORRUPTIONINCOURTSYSTEM.COM AND WWW.NORTHBRISOLNHSTRUSTPUBLICCONCERNS.COM
Enclosed is actual documents just a selection to show issues, in these first 2 pages in brown are documents enclosed for your inspection, which will put in context sites, reason for picket.
BS315289 [2003] Scan 10169 we have proof of posting, scan 10014 and in defence filed it states i can recover loss in court proceedings.
BS08441 Court refuses reference claim 3 to give me a defence.Please note documents BCC1 /HEARING OF 0BS08441 and hearing of OBS08441. As i state no defence, I ALREADY HAVE SELECTED FILE ,eg 2003 documents in court file is this issue to be raised at hearing. . We know at least 4 documents corrupt court removed from file,,,,,DJWatson,,,,,something very very odd here. Read transcript. One was court order to supply defendants references numbers, taken by hand , my copy stamped/dated by the court. There was no reason i had document at trial, could have been therefore struck out as i ignored order, and later in appeal HHJDenyer to conclude to corrupt /frustrate judicial process would ignore application for oral hearing.
2YJO3757 RELITAGATING 0BS08441 Please see document NOTES FOR HEARING 28 prepared for pig circus hearing. Royal Mail say writing difficult to read, so produce document Royal Mail Master to go with claim form, eg just need to add,,,,,,name/article lost on master for any new claim. . Please see royal mail master, scans 10039 10085. 10086. This is identical claim,claim 3 of OBS08441.Please see notes for hearing, skeletal argument for hearing. From master/claim,,,on the,,,,,,,,,,,i sent,,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,of,,,,,,,,,,,,and claiming under regulations 7.4. We have DJBrittan going to any length to corrupt/frustrate the judicial process, eg i had a barristers internet site in bundle, abuse of process ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,you should not be vexed a second time over same facts, where he states ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i have asked him twice ,he states no, he has not full tranccript of court of appeal hearing cited, i will therefore ignore evidence. He then produces the N460 ,scan 10298 which is utter nonsense from POC above, eg typed copy of claim form part of POC. The issue of defendants immune from proceedings never raised at hearing, he had judged case before hearing, Sharing v Preston CC [2012] , He also states i insult the court, nonsense GET READ THE TRANSCRIPT OF OBS08441 WHERE DJWATSON STATES YOU HAVE NO DEFENCE DO YOU REALLY WANT TO COME BACK AFTER YOU GET A DEFENCE. WERE DOCUMENTS REMOVED BY COURT FROM FILE .THIS IS UTTERLY UNFAIR AGAINST THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT FOR CORRUPT COURT . NOT TO GIVE ME A DEFENSE. So we ask for oral hearing, scan 10045 to 1005O Denyer ignores, . Lawyers advise making application for judicial review, court orders scan 10063 to ask Denyer again, taken by hand my copy stamped/dated by the court, 1.2.2013, contacted the court told case closed Denyer will not answer, record conversation with court lawyer in Cardiff, told to ask again, please see stamped/dated by the court 18.2.2013 document scan10299. Told again you will not get a reply, Denyer will ignore application. Not told of judicial review hearing, lawyers Ashfords on file, so application to Court of Appeal. Denyer knows Brittan was wrong, so tactics to corrupt/frustrate the judicial process i will ignore applications.
In the meantime make new claim to Royal Mail, scan 10163 , paid return of post, told head of legal services has gone, we want to turn over a new page, forget award to us. No problems now with claims to Royal Mail. The court produces bundle for hearng Ms Jones asks what other documents for bundle, these labelled a, b. C...............as you can see the request for oral hearing to Denyer scan r to v, which is document above, also enclosed were other 2 applications for oral hearing, scans 10299, ect.
We had call do not approve of some of your applications to my court but will not stand by while corruption is going on Denyers out to get you,one of your applications for a oral hearing the court has forgotten to remove, in recorded conversation at court with Mr Blair, IT IS ON COMPUTER SYSTEM. So no doubt i asked for oral hearing,ALSO from enclosures in this site, but Mr Blair confirms on system, therefore Denyer ignored to corrupt/frustrate the judicial process. the court of appeal as also, in bundle request, however we have corrupt court judgement scan 10252. You can see how court will argue, via Strickson v Preston CC [2007] your asking for a judicial review, under frustration of the judicial process, however we have no frustration, you never asked for a hearing, where documents before the court above showed i had asked, Denyer ignores or bins. There was frustration of the judicial process, as Denyer /court binning applications.
We have claim v NORTHBRISTOL NHSTRUST. They refused to supply medical records so proceedings issue, trust lawyer Ms Smith in malicious way goes whining to the court as i issued proceedings, stating Ms Needs was on holiday, did not see email, when you issued proceedings. please see email Ms Smith was misleading the court. Eg msneedsin work. , she was at work and saw email. New claim for travel expenses and to add a statement to medical records. Please see scan 10065 where trust must allow me to add statement, and refusal to pay travel expensive is no more than Ms Smith stealing my money. Ask to amend claim, court AGAIN ignores then strikes out. So ask Ms Smith to pay travel expenses and let me add statement, see SMITHREJECTION, hiding behind court order. She is stealing my money, without tickets i can not be paid, and unamgigious she must allow me to add a statement. Months later she asks to settle although scan 10065 sent 30 times to trust.
Denyer then issues order i must ask him before i can issue any proceedings, he quotes case V Compuwave, where matter settled, they admit work not fit for purpose, in front of court is Tomlin order, where to conclude DJWatson required to know solely who was person who signed for defendants. Further he quotes case v trust, eg appeal against DJWatsons order as medical records were still outstanding. We had recordings with trust departments, that still medical records outstanding, and in settlement produced by trust, they confirm medical records were outstanding, as these now supplied,eg i had every right to appeal, this order utterly without merit, just corrupt and vindictive. IN APPLICATION IS COURT REFERENCE NUMBER,
We have negligence claim, against trust, lawyers state we will not take on due to quantum, we have Burroughs Day saying, have a claim, eg surgeon wanted urgent physiotherapy in 2 months, trust admit refused to do, as trivial,in 2 months, so had to pay myself. In recording after 2 months surgeon states too late, not required. So we ask Denyer permission to issue proceedings, we know Denyer he would ignore again application, as previous tactics. See email thirdrequest. W e knew trust would not disappoint with nonsense report, eg your fault disabled, you were offered physiotherapy after 3 months, HOWEVER surgeon in recording states not required, SO TRUST ARE OFFEREING TO DO WORK THAT WILL NOT WORK NOT SURPRISING LOSING A MILLION POUNDS PER WEEK. Further state you did not turn up for appointments, where TRUST MS NEEDS ISSUES APOLOGY AS SENT AS I REQUESTED NEW SURGICAL TEAM.
From regulations trust must send Protocol documents as acting in person, after over 6 months before sent, if claim rejected, go to arbitration, where from smithrejection email she refuses to go to arbitration, as also Denyer corrupt , can not take to the courts, leaving me disabled. Was surprised as trust had not contacted Denyer. On the 9.5.2016 this utter corrupt court , after 2 months asks for reference number, all I can do is refer them to INITIAL court application to them as I picket the court. As barrister said why have they waited over 2 months, this court utterly corrupt, assume trust contacted court. This was a urgent application, compare with trust application, urgent, reply in 24 hours, this corrupt court knows urgent, however takes over 2 months to reply, and ignores PREVIOUS EMAILS WHERE REFERENCE NUMBER GIVEN
INTRODUCTION There are important overlap between both sites www.corruptionincourtsystem.com www.northbristolnhstrustpublicconcerns.com Today both sites will be amended,final alteration , 14.4.2016 , North Bristol NHS has until 18.4.2016 9.00 am to reply we know as corrupt we will not get a reply.Obtaining calls ,,,,,we will not treat you go and kill yourself,,,.The trust utter scum.
SECTION PRODUCED 10.00 18.4.2016Need to thank legal people who have helped, as we come to end, via picket, and Mr Berry at computer drop in centre who produced websites , of course not responsible for content. We are dealing with corrupt people Ms Smith trust lawyer, in malicious way goes to court as i issued proceedings, stating we were unaware of possibility, Ms Needs was on holiday, later Ms Needs confirms she was misleading the court i was not on holiday. In claim trust sent recorded delivery tickets for travel expenses, as NHS regulations, however refuse to pay or return tickets so i could process, no more than stealing my money. In terms of NHS regulations she is aware she must allow me to add a statement to my medical records where dispute over content, sent nearly 30 times. We have a defense ,,,,,,,,we do not know what records he wants to add a statement to, however quotes incident in DEFENCE FILED WITH THE COURT. Later claim struck out in papers, where i appealed. She knows from NHS regulations she must allow me to add a statement, now hides behind court order, Information Commissioner then involved where she asks to settle claim, against trust,and statement added.. We have Mr Stoner iNHSLA in another corrupt report, where in negligence report does not address, Ms Poulson stating i am not qualified to treat you, this is trust corrupt tactics in acute abdomen from recording nurse told after sandwich, pain had returned, where she states i will inform doctor. This indicated in report to complaint, however never answered, complain to Ms Needs, told we will address issue by 1.11.2015, numerous follow ups all correspondence ignored. This is issue although in pain trust does not know what is wrong told to walk home. In terms of physiotherapy i had to pay for as required in 2 months [2/12] ,he states you were offered after 2/12, however required in 2/12 from recording of consultation Mr McCann states too late, not required and puts down for surgery. The corruption continues knew it had to be done in 2/12 this was agreement with Dr Dwyer, visited physiotherapy who said trivial will not do in 2/12 ,saw doctor AOC who called Packham at Frenchay, secretary at lunch , where i called his office that afternoon, told he would call me back, no call, took letter Packham, no reply so had to pay for physiotherapy. Ms Young /Packham in corrupt report state,,,,,,,,,,,,,we have no knowledge of letter, however in corrupt way although BT phone records sent to both just ignore in report, utterly corrupt. Then Stoner states you never requested another surgical firm as dispute with Packham, where he is aware from emails utterly untrue, i had stated Packham would not operate on me,require new surgical team, however still get appointments to see Packham, where Ms Needs issues an apology due to harassment . So as planned knew it would be rejected my claim for negligence , asked HHJDenyer to issue proceedings as part of plan, knew i would not get a reply,to cover later emailed again, asking for copy of order by 5.4.2014, initial application 2.3.2016.Knew trust also would reject claim which they did, from Protocol next step to go to arbitration, again knew corrupt trust legal department would ignore, for example Smith/Stoner knew from regulations they must send me copy of Protocol, only sent after many requests.. This document sent via email to me last week, as could show when produced, knew i would not get a reply, wait an hour today then send to all concerned. We have trust issue part of pawn in our plans, however we put on record the following.
a/ We know before the trust would not allow a statement to be added to my medical records, last week i put on record another request , as many weeks ago request ignored. We ask Mr Sykes to process, as we await if trust comply.
b/ FOI issue also raised, eg the doctor /nurse from AOCcalled Mr Packham, does trust keep records of calls from trust .
If negligence claims rejected, where next stage to go to arbitration ,before litagation, where we expect corrupt trust to reject. Mr Stoner has until 9.00 am to contact me, 18.4.2016. For example surgeon last chance , stated, required physiotherapy in 2 months ,,,,,,,,after 2 months would decide if surgery required, physiotherapy admit refusal to do, contact consultant Mr Pachham office, who ignores call/letter therefore had to pay for physiotherapy myself. We have Pachham /trust in corrupt way in reply, saying we had no letter, however NEVER address BT phone records showing call made which was ignored, correspondence stating refusal to treat, required in 2 months. After 2 months told too late now anyway for trust to do physiotherapy, and put down for surgery. Trust refuse to pay physiotherapy costs, ADMIT refusal to do, HHJDenyer as he has always done to frustrate the judicial process in my application to issue proceedings against trust, DOES NOT ANSWER APPLICATION , aware i have a good claim, before ignoring, removing before documents from my file. For example the corrupt lawyer at trust happy to mislead the court, hide behind court order not to allow me to add statement to medical records ,where NHS regulation state she must allow, she works for NHS. Even start sending mail with no stamps on.Only allow to add a statement when Information Comissioner involved. Even as today in new applications will not allow me to add statement to medical records, or supply me medical records like previous applications, utterly corrupt.
Further HHJDenyer defined in text as we conclude in introduction is not honorable, .From call we had proved correct ,,,,HHJDenyer has been out to get you for sometime, by removing evidence, or if evidence overwhelming just will not answer applications for court orders. . Evidence in both websites, these are bullet points . Of utter relevance is historic application for judicial review , rejected in papers where Bristol county court awarded 500.00, asked for oral hearing.At initial Bristol CC hearing heard by DDJGisby , asked for notes, where he states,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,on reflection something odd with this case. Can I quote from Lord Goldrings judgement. Although getting judgement badly wrong, not a reason to grant a judicial review, Srickson v Preston CC [2007] EWHC1132 , further why can Bristol CC not issue proper paperwork, utterly legally flawed hearing appeal without transcript, and the award of 500.00 to the court would be quashed. NEVER FORGIVEN BY THE BRISTOL COURT FOR JUDGEMENT
BS315289 Royal Mail agree i can use proceedings for compensation for lost mail ,for this claim or further claims if they arise. in defence filed and confirmed in correspondence . Issue raised at hearing by DJStewart Brown, where they state we have agreed he can use proceedings, today or future claims. . Later claims of course issue never raised
OBS08441 This claim in 3 parts, one recorded delivery to Bristol County Court, and 2 others where Royal Mail appeal department said should be paid. It appears at hearing claims 1 and 2 put down for payment, so only issue 3. This arose as I obtain royal mail proof of posting as claim made, however claim lost, they state need recorded delivery slip, will NOT accept photocopy now f,,,,,,,,,off. Further they ask for court order for reference numbers of 3 claims, taken by hand my copy stamped by the court. I have no defence to claim 3 as initially lost in the post, RM now have, filed in wrong place. Ask several times for court order for Royal Mail to supply a defence, APPLICATIONS IGNORED. Ask final time a few days before hearing , where Mr Blair states,,,,DJDaniels stated you should take up with judge at hearing, utterly against Human Rights regulations. RM also refused to issue a defence, saying will become clear at hearing, so sent various documents, did not know what they may raise, INCLUDED THE 2003 CORRSPONDENCE SO COURT KNEW I COULD USE PROCEEDINGS V ROYAL MAIL. Heard by DJWatson who states both of you want to address me, where I state I have no defence , where told do you really want to come back, RM barrister states I want struck out, court had stated I had ignored court order to supply reference numbers, [no I had not court removed from file]why is court contacting RM, my copy shows as stamped/dated I had not ignored court order. At hearing 3 OTHER DOCUMENTS TAKEN BY HAND MY COPIES STAMPED BY THE COURT HAD BEEN REMOVED BY THE COURT FROM FILE. Can I quote DJWatson,,,,,,,,,,somethind very very odd here. From claim form for claims, a typed copy is also sent , as can form if required later part of the POC when claim made. RM now offer no defence and claim paid.
So to summarize the court is removing documents from my files, and applications for court orders ignored. For example in this case against Human Rights Act no defense before hearing.
2YJ03757..DJWatson strikes out as not a clear statement of fact, although he heard OBS08441 a few months before, ask for oral hearing. .From master produced,used in OBS08441 state this is an abuse of process, only changes are names /address and item lost, between POC in OBS08441/2YJ03757. I produced master as all I had to do was incert new names/comments. Issue could not be more clear as in this claim master,for 2YJ03757,,,,,,,,,,,,,under regulation in 7.4 I was claiming under , I tick auction valuation again, however state barrister may have accepted under list not exhaustive do not know as offered no defence in OBS08441. DJBrittan told an abuse of process, where told not interested, will not look at , a judge who will go any length to frustrate the judicial process. . From POC in this claim on the 10.2.2012 I sent a 1950 facupfinal programme to Aldridges of,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,BS23EX Claim again under your regulation 7.4 auction valuation or list not exhaustive. Start at hearing, abuse of process will not consider, will go to any length to frustrate the judicial process,corrupt he knows this is an abuse of process. From POC as stated go to their regulations, 7.4 where accept an auction valuation, as proof of value.
Can I quote from POC,
AUCTION VALUATION WHERE FROM OXFORD DICTIONARY AN AUCTION DEFINED ,,,,,PUBLIC SALE WHERE ARTICLES SOLD TO HIGHEST BIDDER
THE ITEM LOST IN SIMILAR CONDITION TO ITEM SOLD BY THIRD PARTY ON EBAY. REFERENCE YOUR BOOK MAIL MADE EASY ....MARKET VALUE REQUIRED THE RECENT SALE BY THIRD PARTY GIVES MARKET VALUE .FURTHER TRADE PUBLICATION .....MARKET VALUE GIVEN.
CAN I REFER TO COURT CASE OBS08441 WHERE YOU HAD SUMMARY OF ABOVE ON THE ,,,,,,,,I SENT ,,,TO,,,,AND CLAIMING UNDER THIRD PARTY SALE ON EBAY OF SAME ITEM SIMILAR CONDITION WHERE YOUR BARRISTER ACCEPTED AS PROOF OF VALUE AND COMMUNICATIONS FROM MS DRAWWATER LEGAL DEPARTMENT ,,,,,,,,,,WE HAVE NO GROUNDS FOR ANY APPEAL AND MONEY WILL BE SENT IN REASPONCE TO MY LETTER AS CLAIM NOT PAID AS COURT JUDGEMENT.
We have judgement DJWatson was right not a clear statement of fact, would be in trouble, HOWEVER states in the N460 claim easy to make,,,on the,,,,,,he sent,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,of,,,,,,,,,,,and regulations he was claiming under. NONE OF THIS DATA IN THE POC UTTERLY CORRUPT SHOWED HIM 5 MINS BEFORE further from RM defence they confirm on the 10.2.2012 I sent a 1950 cupfinal programme to Aldridges ,,,,,,,,,,,,,of,,,,,,,,,,,,,and claiming under 7.4. There defence we do not know if third party sale or one he made on ebay/paypal. IN POC THIS OPTION IN LIST OF 7.4 CROSSED OUT eg not Ebay .So it appears I did give a clear statement of fact. It states item SENT to Aldridges.
NEVER DISCUSSED AT HEARING ALTHOUGH 2003 DOCUMENTS IN FILE AGAIN HE STATES RM ARE IMMUNE FROM PROCEEDINGS. He had judged case before hearing, never raised at hearing, eg he had a closed mind before hearing, Sharing v Preston cc [2012] EWHC 515 , acceptable as grounds for judicial review. He is aware he can state any nonsense where if asking for an appeal Denyer would reject.
REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING UNDER CPR 52.3[4]
Denyer ignores, which is his tactics where he knows the court/any defendant has no defence, application to Administration court , where in their order told twice again to ask Denyer for oral hearing , again as in OBS08441 taken by hand my copies stamped by the court he again ignores to frustrate the judicial process.The issue under Strickson v Preston cc [2007] EWHC 1132 , for judicial review under frustration of the judicial process where Denyer knows DJBrittan was wrong, I did make a clear statement of fact,,,,,,,,,,on the,,,,,,,,,,,i sent,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,,.In 2003 documents RM state I can recover loss in litigation.
Again using master,6.12 2013 ,,,, NEW claim paid by RM, who state head of legal services had left we want to turn over a new page, and 2YJ03757 should have been paid, SO 2YJ03757 WAS A CLEAR STATEMENT OF FACT AS THEY UNDERSTOOD NEW CLAIM. THE ADMINISTRATION COURT NOW STRIKES OUT AS I HAD,,,,,,,,,,NOT AVALIED MYSELF TO CORRECT BY ASKING FOR ORAL HEARING ALTHOUGH MY COPIES STAMPED BY THE COURT .AS IN OBS08441 IS THE COURT BINNING MY APPLICATIONS. FURTHER CALL,,,,,,,,,,,,,COURT/DENYER OUT TO GET YOU DO NOT APPROVE OF SOME OF YOUR APPLICATIONS TO MY COURT, HOWEVER WILL NOT STAND BY WHILE CORRUPTION IS GOING ON ONE OF YOUR APPLICATIONS DENYER HAS FORGOTTEN TO REMOVE FOR ORAL HEARING. IN RECORDING WITH MR BLAIR IN COURT OFFICE CONFIRMS THEY HAD MISSED AND NOT REMOVED FROM COURT FILE TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. WE HAVE LATER APPLICATION TO COURT OF APPEAL, WHERE THEY PRODUCE BUNDLE WITH ONE APPLICATION FOR ORAL HEARING, ASKED IF I WANT TO ADD FURTHER WHERE TOLD WE NEED OTHER 2 ALSO. WE HAVE JUDGEMENT THERE WAS NO FRUSTRATION OF THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, YOU HAD NEVER ASKED FOR A ORAL HEARING. THIS JUDGEMENT UTTERLY CORRUPT, BY SAYING YOU MADE NO APPLICATIONS THE COURT IN CORRUPT WAY CAN SAY THERE WAS NO FRUSTATION OF COURT SYSTEM, YOU NEVER MADE APPLICATION.
So again documents removed from file, and applications to Denyer where he ignores applications.
INTERACTION WITH NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST.
Again need to go to main facts, detail in sites. Trust refuse to supply medical records, so proceedings issued, AOIBS346. Trust lawyer Ms Smith in malicious way goes to court whining to DJWatson as trust unaware of possible proceedings. This was misleading the court, email 13.7.2013 told if no reply by 1.8.2013, I would issue proceedings, Ms Smith maintain you sent email to Ms Needs who was on holiday, recent email from Ms Needs confirms she was not on holiday, Ms Smith does not know what is true and what is false. Limited medical records supplied, where I had recordings with different departments that still medical records outstanding, these supplied much later in final settlement, .DJWatson strikes out in papers where I ask for oral hearing, from recordings medical records still outstanding. I HAD EVERYRIGHT TO APPEAL JUDGEMENT AS SUPPLIED NEARLY A YEAR LATER. CAN WE CALL DENYER 2. NO REPLY FOR ORAL HEARING AGAIN,
AOIBS746 ,,,This was a claim to add statement to medical records, eg NHS Choices ,,,,,,if you require to have your records amended is refused the record holder must attach a statement of your views to the record. Although document sent nearly 30 times Ms Smith refused to do. The second part I sent tickets so I could be paid travel expenses . Ms Smith ignored all correspondence, so proceedings issued now Ms Smith states in defence ,,,,we do not know what records he wants to add a statement, however quotes event in her defence. AOIBS346 issued under new regulations should have been older regulation, accepted claim by trust, now in AO1BS746 apology to court/defendants ask to amend or remove claim and reissue, application again ignored, where later DJRowe strikes out. Ms Smith asked as regulations to allow me again to add statement, where she states no case struck out, however NHS regulations state she must allow me to add a statement. Ask for oral hearing DENYER 1 where again Denyer ignores application. Would argue asked for order to amend, or remove and reissue, or via
Stuart v Goldberg [2008] EWCA Civ 1 ,,,,,,,,,,,the raising of a defence in later proceedings may without more amount to abuse if court satisfied the defence could have been raised in previous proceedings, ,,,,,,,,,,,,[they had accepted previous claim under new regulations. Denyer ignores application as clearly I had every right to appeal judgement. Further in second part, although have tickets to pay travel expenses Ms Smith refuses to pay, of note much later as they ask to settle, money paid and statement added to records.
Again applications to Denyer ignored
NEGLIGENCE CLAIM. [Smith again with Mr Stoner NHSLA ]
a/ Sent for xray trust state no abnormaility to account for impingement of shoulder
b/ Sent to CATS where told I need to inject into shoulder and do physiotherapy however not qualified to inject.
c/ Sent to surgeon Dr Dwyer who injects asks for urgent physiotherapy in 2 months [2/12] and in 2/12 will decide if required to operate.
d/ After 1/12 heard nothing visited physiotherapy told trivial no physiotherapy,. Contacted consultant Mr Packham via letter/phonecall, records of call from BT from home to his office, however maintains no contact. Trust admit refusal to treat, in 2/12 so had to pay myself for physiotherapy.
e/ After 2/12 seen by surgeon told too late now physiotherapy not required and put down for surgery. [consultation recorded]
f/ Complaint to trust, where maintain i never contacted Packham, however deception exposed from BT phone records.
g/ As being called dishonest, ask for new surgical firm, however still get appointments to see Packham, where trust Ms Needs issues apology due to harassment as continue sending for me to see Packham. From emails from trust, confirm request asking for new surgical firm, in final settlement of AOIBS347,,,,,Ms Smith states,,,,,,,,,,,request for new firm will be addressed when I deal with negligence claim.
The reply from Stoner/Smith could have come from the court. Do not address Ms Poulson saying not qualified to treat. Saying you should not have paid for physiotherapy, as offered my physiotheraspy AFTER you saw surgeon second time, however he states at consultation too late not required now, and puts down for surgery. They state you made no request for a different surgical firm to operate, where we have emails for example,,,,,,,,,,,,,i understand your making a request for new surgical team at NBT. Complain as I had not seen Packham as appointments given, I did not attend, where trust UTTERLY aware I was not coming as required new team, can I quote from email,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i will not see Packham, where later Ms Needs issues apology due to harassment over these appointments sent.
The report of Smith/Stoner utterly corrupt, as behaviour in this matter. From regulations knew acting in person, therefore knew I had to be sent Protocol document, sent after 6/12. From regulations knew if still a dispute eg rejection of claim, go for arbitration, bet trust refuse, reply required in 3 days.
Denyer makes order I had to ask his permission before proceedings could be issued, quotes DENYER 1 AND 2 and case v Compuwave. as reason. Well you have evidence for example medical records were not complete reason I appealed DJWatsons order only supplied by trust in final settlement. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Compuwave produced a program to do a job that was not fit for purpose, later admitted wrong program , asked to settle and Tomlin order sent to the court to conclude,. DJWatson asks who signed order for Compuwave, to conclude, where at a later date claim struck out. This is a claim settled,. DENYERS ORDER IS MALICIOUS .
Six weeks ago the corruption continues, knew result asked Denyer for permission to issue proceedings over negligence claim, [as in request for oral hearing in 2YJ03757, where told court out to get you, where applications binned/removed to pervert the course of justice]. Knew he would ignore,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, future emails, ,,,,,if no reply 5.4.2016 will assume refusal to reply. Trust refuse to go to arbitration, Denyer makes sure I can not issue proceedings, leaving me via these corrupt people disabled.
Again we can see Denyer ignoring requests for court orders, as he did in 2YJ03757, where Higher court asked me to make application and he refuses to answer and bin application, We have in negligence claim, Denyer believes he can issue order stopping me from issue of proceedings, where issued with no merit, he states i must ask his permission to serve, then as corrupt ignore application. .Same picture as in call ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Denyer has been out to get you for sometime, in 2YJ03757 although numerous applications for a oral hearing, he ignores , made one mistake court had forgotten to remove one from computer records, which makes all judgements nonsense,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,eg no evidence he asked for a oral hearing to correct, .
This is a trust in July-September 2014 they were the third worse in the country to treat/discharge or admit 95 percent of A/E patients in 4 hours, where expect soon deficit of near 34 million pounds, what a way to run a trust. Even a few hours ago, 14.4.2016 see latest position, as second worse in country for delay at A/E. Issues related to www.corruptionincourtsystem.com. Later this court corruption related also to this trust, ignoring applications, binning. Further this document will allow trust to start proceedings as they have claimed they will do as statements derogatory towards trust, and reason why banned from trust. We have asked for example parliamentary and health service ombudsman, to investigate, still outstanding what history is untrue, what is in medical records to confirm their reason for ban, without proceedings you can draw your own deductions,they have nothing., and will not supply evidence they rely on, clear Human Rights issue. . For example serious allegations, trust lawyer Ms Smith was misleading the court, the trust Ms Needs in email statement confirm evidence Ms Smith produced in the court was untrue, and she knew untrue, and she was misleading the court. . We have complaint to the Nursing and Midwifery Council [NMC] over libellous statement made by trust chief nursing officer, to my GP, that i caused criminal damage, where police state no case to answer, window already broken, just caused if any further damage. further as legal advice trust informed if still maintain to start a private criminal proceedings, or withdraw. . We have a complaint also to the ombudsman, as trust AGAIN refuse to supply medical records, to maintain their reasons why ban issued. Finally have contacted many months ago my MP Mr Lopresti , who states he had contacted trust, again in all these authorites waiting for a reply. We have calls from trust,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,go and kill yourself,, I will not treat,,,,,,,,,,this is scum trust I am dealing with. We have a skeletal argument of facts followed by detailed explanation of events. Shortly a picket outside of court/trust , in relation to web site cited also above, although a bridge of facts between both websites, they have now been made seperate as being used for different reasons. For example this site for negligence claim over impingement of shoulder, where trust admits for example refusal to do physiotherapy in 2 month period, where i had to pay, we await trust rejecting claim a draft of site sent to trust before we heard from trust/NHSLA. In terms of website you can see judges called corrupt, eg removing documents from my file to pervert the course of justice or where they know the defendants have no defence, ignore application for court orders. it was hoped the court would from barristers advice start proceedings over contempt of court. They know facts true, eg court of appeal judgement where it states I had not asked for a oral hearing to correct issue, where from call from the court told,,,,,,,,,,,i do not approve of some of your applications to my court, however I will not stand by while corruption is going on , they have been out to get you for sometime. They have forgotten to remove from records one of your applications for a oral hearing, it is still on system, which is fatal to court judgement. Know not allowed to film in court, however have recording with Mr Blair at court office where he CONFIRMS on system, [request for oral hearing all taken by hand, my copies stamped by the court] and further Mr Blair states these were forwarded to the HIGHER court. Had to make application to HHJDenyer to issue proceedings, knew trust would reject claim, knew HHJDenyer as before would ignore/bin my application, initial application 2.3.2016 follow up 28.3.2016, with statement if no reply by 5.4.2016 would assume he would not reply to my application, as before where he ignored higher court order to ask him for a oral hearing. Proved correct applications ignored,,,,,,binned. From regulations can ask next step for arbitration, before proceedings, trust reply can ask for arbitration where application made, with statement if I do not hear from you by 18.4.2016 will assume trust will not go for arbitration.
SKELETAL ARGUMENTS CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER
Lower limb problem, trust treats, my people inform GP this will not work, which were proved correct, chronic back pain, offer no treatment, again private staff resolve. Have impingement of shoulder, after 7 months surgeon confirms negligence, cause via abnormality in scapula, initially trust states no abnormality. Then refuse to do physiotherapy against surgeons instuctions,in 2 month period, so put down for surgery, then refuse to offer surgery with new surgical team, as surgeon calling me dishonest therefore asked for new surgical firm. Have direct/indirect inguinal hernia, agreed with GP that chronic pain over incision site, after operation, caused by granulation tissue. Then repair of hernia breaks down. Have acute abdomen trust fail numerous times to find cause, including out of hours GP service based at trust. I made diagnoses of acute abdomen , confirmed by GP. Then banned for no reason , trust refuse to supply evidence they rely on. Trust makes libelous allegations, to my GP, where NMC [nursing midwifery council] asked to investigate, as trust refuse to remove allegations. Take up with ombudsman, still waiting for reply, ask for medical records which trust refuse to supply, previously had to use courts to obtain. Contact Information Commissioner to get further medical records, again waiting for reply, after request for copy of initial request for medical records. . Mr Lopresti MP informed nearly 6 months ago, what was going on, again still waiting for reply. Skeletal facts. We have now situation, where told banned, however reasons confidential we will not inform you. We of course have no evidence, however as will not disclose, could Ms Jones have said, give you, 100.00 will you make up something for me, until trust give evidence, you can draw you own conclusions. As stated we have no evidence, no allegations, until we see evidence if any. Application required to issue proceedings against trust, After stating they would reject claim for negligence, in draft of this document sent to trust, they confirm rejection. The reasons are utter nonsense, please see below. From regulations at this stage you can ask for arbitration, trust /NHSLA asked for reply by the 18.4.2016, with no reply will assumer refusal to go for arbitration.
a/ We have lower limb problem where trust use their CATS [clinical assessment and treatment] department, advised to use shoe incerts to correct, can I please refer to my physiotherapist comments to my GP ,,,,,will not work, afterwards [trust state use for 2 months] I will correct, proved correct.Since building new hospital trust always in the news over unacceptable clinical practices.
b/ Lower back pain,contribution of cause via ostreophytes, trust state we can offer no treatment, you will have to put up with pain.. RTA [road traffic accident] where insurance company sends for private physiotherapy , while stationary at traffic lights a woman ran in back of my car. Private treatment organised by insurance company, where told stance of trust unacceptable, eg we can produce a long term program which you can use , after our physiotherapy, no need to come back, which will give you relief from pain Again still of benefit.
c/ Impingement of shoulder ,GP believes possible abnormality in scapula, asks for xray, trust takes xray no abnormality in shoulder to account for symptoms. Again sent to CATS told not qualified to treat , going on course shortly to allow me to inject corticosteroid into shoulder then do physiotherapy, clinical protocol to restore movement as soon as possible, or could get chronic shoulder disability. Sent for ultrasound confirm no abnormality. After 7 months seen by surgeons, who confirm reason for impingement , as they ask for further xray to confirm Bigliane acromium ,trust utterly incompetant, please see a/ b/ above. Told believe too late, however will inject and get urgent physiotherapy , in 2 months, if no significant improvement in 2 months after physiotherapy, we will need to operate to resolve. Again protocol if no physiotherapy after injection, the injection utterly of no value, eg restore movement as soon as possible. After 4 weeks visit physiotherapy as this trust offered no physiotherapy, told trivial we will not treat, eg over rule doctor, admitted by physiotherapy in correspondence in this 2 month period, they will not offer physiotherapy. Telephone consultant, write to consultant ,,,,,,,,,,,,they have refused to treat, all correspondence ignored. So had to pay privately for physiotherapy. After 2 months, put down for surgery, told too late now for physiotherapy. In complaint, told I had never consulted the consultant, with my concerns although trust has phone records. Being called dishonest told trust this surgical firm would not operate on me, asked for new surgical firm to operate, where trust asked me to confirm, then in email told we will not be answering your correspondence, for new surgical firm. Letters written, post office proof of posting, request for new surgical firm ignored. . GP states his only option to use this trust, therefore I am left with disability, although of course from physiotherapy trust refused to do, and I had to pay for improvements obtained. Still get letters for surgery with this firm, trust apologises, then consultant attacks me as I had not turned up for appointments.Again trust utter shambles.
d/ We have direct/indirect inguinal hernia, trust agrees to take home after surgery, after surgery they refuse to do this. We have situation after surgery, in constant pain ,,,,,,,over incision [as my views confirmed by GP ] that caused by granulation tissue formed. As protocol no extensive exercise for several months, after a year resume seriously playing and tennis coaching. Accept using the advanced kick serve puts large stress on abdominal muscles which resulted in breakdown of repair .Trust finds it impossible to give acceptable clinical treatment.Compare a/ b/ c/ .
e/ Medical records were required which trust refused to supply, forcing me to issue proceedings, further the trust refused to correct wrong medical records , where a dispute from NHS Choices document sent to them, I am allowed to enclose in medical records my account of events. THIS DOCUMENT SENT OVER 30 TIMES. We have a dispute just let me put as regulations my recall. In respect to hernia operation, journey to hospital the bus tickets sent recorded delivery to trust for payment, where they refuse to pay, EVEN answer any correspondence. Only when the Information Commissioner involved were corrections made, and payment made. The trust lawyer misleads the court saying proceedings should never have been issued, they were unaware of possibility, later email from trust Ms Needs confirm lawyer was misleading the court, they were aware . Further after a year outstanding medical records supplied, the documents from surgeon to my GP confirming negligence eg there was abnormality in scapula contributing to impingement of shoulder ,Bigliane acromium , this document only supplied by my GP.
f/ We have an acute abdominal presentation. Trust admit they did not make diagnoses, FURTHER presentation , , again failed to make diagnoses. We have severe abdominal pain, such after time have lost consciousness. , however like switching off a light, the pain just goes after say 3 to 4 hours in agony. At one presentation at trust we are at stage where pain just goes, had discussed with GP, a possible D/D of a bilary problem, as further brown pigmentation of skin, [jandice] this information also given to trust. . Given sandwich , record conversation with nurse, told back in pain where she states I will inform doctor from recording. Now told at 4.00 am to walk home, where from recording in tears as in pain, further lead on wall while walking home at 4.00 am where police ask what I am doing, again recorded. . GP believes my D/D is correct asks trust to do ultrasound to confirm. Another attack , going on several hours , call GP services out of hours, BASED at this trust. Told to drive to trust as service based at this terrible trust, so we have someone in severe pain, have passed out before, now being told to DRIVE where I could have killed numerous people. Via perspiration soaking wet, as in pain, so take bath, where heat of water helps pain relief, where out of hours GP service at this trust calls, told to put some clothes on, and you have attack of INDIGESTION. . Told to ask GP for Gaviston next day. Now banned from trust, return to later. Another severe attack while at library where I try to get to BRI hospital Bristol via bus. Pass out on bus, where taken to the BRI hospital. For the first time dealt with in a proper way,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,your being admitted not going home until we know what is wrong, same information as given at trust, where now liver enzyme confirm my diagnoses a bilary problem,, So I had been in agony for months solely due to this incompetent trust. That evening in consultants teaching ward round the nightmare explained , consultant states history, where as he raises both arms to students diagnoses uttered.Everyone in firm made diagnoses ,why could this terrible trust not make diagnoses, from above, as staff at BRI stated should have been diagnosed a long time ago, i was ABLE to make diagnosis.
g/ We move to ban from trust in 3 sections, can i please deal with each. We have this trust making allegations where i ask for evidence, and this corrupt trust refuse to answer. ,there are clear Human Rights issues here, eg to know what you accused of .
1/ DEROGATORY STATEMENT ABOUT TRUST ,STAFF ,,,,,,Lets consider above , on internet for nearly a year, elsewhere, if untrue why have trust not issued proceedings, they have stated if website not removed they would issue proceedings., so lets assume true. We have problem the trust will not state, what allegations in your medical records we are relying on. Further in email trust lawyer called a bitch, IMMEDIATELY removed and alternative word used , MALICIOUS /WHINING later . Further an APOLOGY issued IMMEDIATELY to Ms Smith . Why was it made, the trust informed if medical records not supplied in 3 weeks proceedings would be issued, no reply so proceedings issued, several years ago. . The trust maintain Ms Needs was on holiday, and we were unaware of email.Then in court the trust lawyer Ms Smith misleads the court, in a MALICIOUS way , WHINING saying proceedings should not have been issued as we were utterly unaware of possible issue of proceedings, from a consultant at trust i was working for, and MUCH LATER email from Ms Needs confirmed Ms Smith was misleading the court, she was not on holiday when email sent. Can I refer to transcript of hearing, where Ms Smith in a malicious way try to shout me down while I was giving evidence, where reprimanded by DJWatson,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,he did not interrupt you when you gave evidence , let him speak. These proceedings later were settled on request of trust, at that meeting clear Ms Smith does not know difference between what is false/true. She informs manager Mr Cresswell utter unaware of possible litagation over negligence of shoulder, all i can say, please look at emails, utterly untrue, months before, further aware acting in person, and as a lawyer aware from protocol, that a copy via statatory regulations should be forwarded to me , of regulations concerning negligence,
2/ THEATS OF PHYSICAL VIOLENCE TOWARDS STAFF ..I have recordings of visits, there are threats playing back tapes,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,you will be reported to Ms Needs in complaints department only.
3/ CAUSED CRIMINAL Damage........Police find no evidence to support, told initially you will not have day in court,no case to answer, and later answering bail, no case to answer. From legal advice trust told if they maintain, they can issue a private criminal summons.
WE ASK TRUST WHAT EVIDENCE IN MY MEDICAL RECORDS THEY ARE USING WE HAVE ASKED PARLIAMENTARY AND HEALTH SERVICE OMBUDSMAN TO INVESTIGATE BAN STILL WAITING FOR REPLY
We now get a reply, will not take issue of criminal damage as reason for ban, however will use other 2 options, however will not inform you what evidence we have its confidential, no it is not its made up. People have a right to know incompetence of this trust.
h/ So ask ombudsman to deal with ban, issued utterly with no merit, still waiting for reply.What records do you have to maintain your reasons for ban. Take up issue with NMC [nursing midwifery council] over libel statement to my GP, again still waiting for reply.
I/ Have recording of visits, plus all medical records, except final visit, where trust refuse to supply AGAIN medical records. From final visit have full recording, did obese nurse state in records she was threatened with physical violence. Again the Information Commissiner involved as we await these medical records, plus records of alleged threats, derogatory statements.
j/ Then obtain medical records of third party, my address on letter, which indicates possible terminal illness, Talk to GP surgery told not interested, doctor no longer works here, and trust refuse to send a sae so I can return to trust. So still have third party medical records.
k/ Mr Lopresti MP informed what was going on over 6 months ago, however numerous request to him to contact trust, still waiting for reply. We have just one email saying waiting for reply, assume trust refuse to reply to my MP. However in respect to www.corruptionincourtsystem.com, we did get a reply,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i can not force the court office to answer my letters. So he is saying I have evidence of someone perverting the course of justice, however as the court office refuse to answer my letters I can do nothing, This has relevance with recent child abuse cases,,,,,,,,,,,,i was aware of this but did nothing.
l/ As expected HHJDenyer does not even reply to application for court order, then trust reject claim, ask for arbitration.
DETAILS EXPANDED OF ABOVE
.
1/ Have impingement of shoulder, GP believes possible abnormality in scapula, the defendants takes xray, and in report on xray states, no abnormality. In clinical protocol movement should be restored as soon as possible, otherwise could get a chronic disability. My GP refers to CATS , [a department of defendants] , GP concerned by delay, eg movement should be restored as soon as possible, and contacts CATS again, and appointment reluctantly then given. At consultation told now after this long delay, I am not qualified to treat you, not allowed to give injection, into shoulder, going on course shortly, to show me procedure. So defendants appoints a member of staff who states I am not qualified to treat you, what sort of hospital trust are defendants running. Then referred to defendants surgeons, seen by Dr Dwyer who stated, I believe negligence, however to make sure could you take my request to xray, for a new xray, to confirm negligence, via this special view. All events same afternoon. He confirms negligence, in notes he makes, and in letter to my GP, Biglian acromium, Further states physiotherapy should have been done earlier, after giving injection, I will get urgent physiotherapy, if no significant improvement in 2 months, I will need to operate. Was asked to take application for physiotherapy, to their department, everyone going home at 3.40 pm, however told we will look at on Monday. Every thing was closed down, angry as she had coat on, and had to unlock office to leave urgent request for physiotherapy, in office. After 4 weeks, had heard nothing, and visited physiotherapy, told trivial complaint we will not see you in 2 months, although told required by surgeon. . Contact consultant, Mr Packham office, confirmed from BT phone records, after talking to secretary, as I had heard nothing, from physiotherapy, later left letter taken by hand to his secretary, heard nothing, so had to pay privately for physiotherapy, after 2 months saw surgeon Mr Mc Cann. Notes big improvement, due to physiotherapy, however not enough from clinical quidelines, and puts down for surgery. In Dwyer and McCann [later surgeon who treated] notes taken, for example as I was leaving, Mr McCann called me back, brown medical file reopened, and told, due to the negligence, missed Biglian acromium, I may have to shave acromium bone , as he stated, medical notes required for reminder for later surgery plan. Complaint made to defendants, where they state, no abnormality, where they are aware from letters of Dwyer/McCann to my GP, that there was an abnormality, and was missed, trying by deception to hide issue, However could say this as these letters later the reader will see, plus notes taken by surgeons had been removed from my medical records. In correspondence Mr Packham attacks me and states I had never contacted his office to express my concerns. For example BT phone records show untrue. Due to friction believed best if a new surgical firm operated, however defendants confirmed refusal to treat, via template Smith, eg ignored email. Ms Needs asks me to confirm I wanted a new surgical team, which I did followed by email,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,we will not be answering your correspondence. I had showed trust dishonest, and in spiteful way now refused to treat, with new surgical team. GP stated he had no options if they refuse to treat, as would not transfer to a new surgical team. Had later request for appointments with Mr Packham, clearly the trust confirming their stance, you have Packham or no one, where I informed Ms Needs I require new surgical firm, she states trust informed he would not be allowed to treat, then get numerous more request, email/correspondence for appointments with Mr Packham. Very clear the trust would only let Packham operate, against my request. Complain to Ms Needs again, ",,,,,," you will never believe this still getting appointments with Packham, as still getting appointments to see Packham, where she emails her apology. The government states 16 weeks to treat, we are over 40 weeks, the trust a utter shambles.
2/ I have a hernia operation, defendants refused to take home, although consultant indicated he would organise this, , after surgery, further they are sent recorded delivery, travel tickets for payment, as allowed travel expenses for travel to hospital for surgery. They refuse to pay, just ignore correspondence and reminders.
3/ Numerous request, for medical records, court number AOIBS346 , in the end beginning of July 2014, issue a template Smith, eg state if I do not hear from you by the 1.8.2014 will assume you refuse to supply medical notes relating to impingement of shoulder, and will issue proceedings, which was done. Defendants state you should not have issued, as we were not aware of your email as Ms Needs was on holiday, from enquires, I have been told untrue, she was not on holiday throughout July. Later email from Ms Needs confirms the deception after court hearing, she was not on holiday. Partial medical records documents released, for example the request for physiotherapy not released, the notes taken by surgeons not released, the request by Dr Dwyer for xray to be taken not released, for example did it mention reason xray was requested as surgeon believed negligence as scapula abnormality. The defendants numbered partial documents, that they now supply, after forcing me into litigation, see the letters of both surgeons, confirming negligence, to my GP removed, as were notes taken at consultation. Further the letter to my GP confirming negligence not given, obtained from GP. Clearly the defendants were trying to hide evidence of negligence. The actual collection of medical records was recorded, where I state, medical records not in form I was taught to make, notes not in chronological order and loose. It appears someone had gone through records to remove evidence to pervert the course of justice. AOIBS346 issued where defendants accept claim, and pay cost of my application, in AOIBS346. As documents still outstanding, eg request for xray, by Dr Dwyer, we have hearing in the Bristol court to obtain outstanding documents. I was also given notes of the hernia operation, see statement utterly untrue, eg I was offered transport home, WE HAVE A DISPUTE so send NHS document that confirmed allowed to add statement to medical records, if dispute over content, which defendants refused to do, eg for me to add statement. Therefore refuse to allow a statement or return tickets for travel expenses. . Also defendants had been sent tickets for travelling expenses recorded delivery for hernia operation, with note if you will not process please return tickets. In email issue template Smith, state if I do not hear from you by "....." will assume you will not supply, and will issue proceedings, however with your application, this date can be extended, no reply, proceedings issued.AOIBS746. Via inducement forced into proceedings again AO1BS746, eg would not correct records, or process for travel expenses. At hearing AOIBS346 defendants state I had used new regulations, should have used older regulations, and data protection act. Earlier application as legal advice, made to amend the particulars of claim, in AO1BS746 or remove and then reissue, no reply as court had done many times before, eg binning applications. . In terms of AOIBS346, they had informed the court they had accepted claim, paid cost of application, and DJWatson told them, they could not ask the court, to allow them to overturn a defence they had entered, as they had accepted claim. under NEW regulations. I therefore amend the particulars of claim, AOIBS746/AOIBS903 [HERNIA OPERATION], apologise to the court and defendants, and ask for an order , to allow amendment to the particulars of claim. The court /defendants sent new particulars of claim, and via application ask to amend original particulars of claim, no reply. For example could have withdrawn claim, and issued new claim, will suggest in terms of cost, it was best for the court to allow amendment. DJRowe then ignores my application and strikes out claim, where I appeal. I had asked for order before this date, further, from
Stuart v Goldberg [2008] EWCA Civ 1 ,,,,,The raising of a defence in later proceedings may without more amount to abuse if court satisfied the defence could have been raised in previous proceedings,,,,,,,,,,,
Would argue could have been raised in previous claim, now an abuse, further DJRowe aware application the court again ignored to process, as before [eg www.corruptionincourtsystem.com ] Application for oral hearing of course HHJDenyer to frustrate the judicial process ignores application again, as in claims in www.corruptionincourtsystem.com can we call this application DENYER ONE
Another application in Feb 2015, and on the 20.5.2015. Again we have no replies, [similar pattern as in Royal Mail case as I ask for a oral hearing please see website www.corruptionincourtsystem.com]. Further request 6.7.2015, and the 13.7.2015, NO reply before hearing on the 17.7.2015, court ignored again applications. To cover all options, asked the court to email response to court order application. At hearing, not knowing anything about court orders, defendants inform me their request for orders answered in a FEW DAYS , you can draw your own conclusion, of a bias court. For example in AOIBS746 the xray manager states, request for xray scanned and put on system, and we always issue a report, I have asked for court order to use recording. On the 3.7.2015, defendants ask to settle, where everything agreed. I make Tomlin order, which defendants refuse now to sign. They insist orders still stand, eg my claims should be struck out, this has no merit. DJWatson order in respect to statement made by Ms Needs that all medical records supplied, where I had recordings from physiotherapy/radiology that medical records were still outstanding, therefore appealed DJWatsons order that claim struck out as I had evidence medical records still outstanding , proved correct in final settlement as these supplied by trust. The order utterly of no merit so sought a oral hea ring, again court ignored application. CAN WE CALL THIS DENYER TWO. .. For example AOIBS346, the defendants did not supply full records, eg the request for xray to be taken, then for the FIRST TIME , on the 3.7.2015, produce document which they would not let me take away, ask if these are for me, told no, would not let me take away. Can I refer to APPLICATION TO RESTORE my applications, in summary final section "....." defendants are saying xrays taken although no request for xray, in main text of that application explaining what was required, Can I refer to email to Ms Smith defendants lawyer, on the 13.2.2015. in respect to outstanding documents still outstanding, "....." request, for supply of Dr Dwyers request for xray. Then only on the 3.7.2015 did I know they were prepared to supply. For Ms Smith to insist the court orders stand, particularly of DJWatson is utterly nonsense, from day 1 she knew what was required, and even a few days before hearing , THIS DOCUMENT STILL OUTSTANDING. i did not have FULL medical records.Ask defendants as GMC discussion to write to surgeons, to see where notes had gone, which defendants refused to do, now on the 3.7.2015 produce their summary of surgeons reply, after defendants contact them. The defendants lawyer openly lies to me, eg I was not aware of ANY negligence claim, where she is shown email, where no fee lawyers asked me to ask her to make an offer. The GMC [general medical council]asked her to contact surgeons, which she refused to do, now months later, we have a confusing summary of defendants, only presented, 3.7.2015 in respect to contacting surgeons , which initially they refused to do, as my initial application to the court, eg Dr Dwyer has now changed sex, and Mr McCann is no longer a surgeon. These replies from surgeons not supplied. Ms Smith states she would get further information from surgeons, of course we never obtained a reply. I had every right to ask the court to reconsider, we have recording with manager at xray, saying, request for xray, we scan and put on system, and we issue a report, again we have application via court order to use recording, however the court again, as in request for oral hearing, in Royal Mail case refuse to reply to my application for a court order. ONLY 3.7.2015 PREPARED TO SUPPLY MEDICAL RECORDS WHICH THEY KNEW EXISTED AND WITHHELD. MAKES NONSENSE OF DJWATSONS ORDER MEDICAL RECORDS WERE NOT COMPLETE The recording confirms, request/report for xray exists. Its very clear the court response is we will ignore all of my correspondence to the court, he will go away, compare again with cited website above, where we have High court order to make application to Bristol court, www.corruptionincourtsystem.com twice taken by hand, stamped by the court as delivered by hand in my copy, then have call ,,,,,,,,,,,court out to get you, applications binned, ,,,,,,,,,,,where we have judgement,,,,,,,,,,i had not availed myself to resolve by asking for a oral hearing, where the court is just perverting the course of justice by binning applications.
4/ Lets consider AO1BS746, we do not know if the court will allow amendment to the particulars of claim, all request ignored. There are 2 issues, where the defendants Ms Needs /Smith refuse to return tickets or process application, for travel expenses, this amounts to fraud, both know without tickets, this old age pensioner can not be paid. They are utterly aware this is no more than stopping me obtain money, the issue of stealing my money should be before the general public, raising issue plus refusal to treat, to see corruption that is occurring. Was going to ask defendants cashier one more time, smash cashier window to get arrested, defendants however cashier pay claim, previously refused, now done with no tickets, unless Ms Smith sent to them, and out of time... From day I sent NHS Choices document where allowed to amend, inaccurate medical records, defendants knew this from day 1, however only on the 3.7.2015, would allow me to amend records. Asked them in Feb 2015 ,sent NHS document, however Ms Smith clearly determined she would not alter records, ignores request saying the court has struck out your claim, to alter records, as you used latest regulations, we are aware WE MUST allow you to add a statement to medical records, , forced you into litigation, now will hide behind court order, will not allow. . . We produce Tomlin order, to cover all issues, where defendants aware they asked to settle, the strike out claims therefore would not be mentioned in settlement order. Defendants are going to court, to prove for example AOIBS346 should have been struck out, however STILL MEDICAL RECORDS OUTSTANDING WHICH THEY NOW REFUSE TO SUPPLY. Its of interest again refused transport home. Further in this new clinical presentation we have utterly unprofessional behaviour of staff. We have nurse in my room, indicating patient by name, and discussing patient with a CVA. In discussion with other nurse indicating neural pathways, which were not strictly true. While spending half an hour discussing this patient in front of me, he has my bloods in his pocket, which required analyse. Then wait a further hour, where told we have forgotten to send bloods to pathology, we will do now. The A/E at Southmead a utter shambles, see latest inspection of hospital confirms from press reports.
5/ Court issues hearing date, , no point attending, as a corrupt court, as expected the court refused to answer request for ANY court orders, for example could see Ms Smith objecting to use of recording, confirming report made on all xrays, Claim AOIBS346. We have issued new template Smith, with no reply, can take things into my own hands. For example what did trust write to surgeons, nothing to do with surgeons reply, will assume just mention my name, and not detail of presentation. Ms Smith states the surgeons can not remember things a year ago, true if they did not mention facts of case, eg negligence. As a medical student, at defendants trust, I can remember ALL cases where there was negligence. We ask Smith when I was there, working 100 hours/week, did the trust eg send a very young woman home, parents unaware of pregnancy, without examination, who had a baby an hour afterwards, did we have severe complications, as a scaphoid fracture was missed by same doctor. Did Ms Needs indicate background, eg Mr McCann, calling me back ,reopened notes, and stated for trust records, I need to confirm we have agreed to shave acromium bone, at surgery. The trust is utterly corrupt, told to walk home recently although in pain, take for example AO1BS746, they are sent NHS DOCUMENT CONFIRMING I COULD LEAVE A STATEMENT CONCERNING INACCURATE MEDICAL RECORDS BUT REFUSED TO DO. THEY HAVE REQUEST TO PROCESS TRAVEL EXPENSES CLAIM OR RETURN TICKETS "....." HOWEVER IGNORE ALL CORRESPONDENCE AS IN RECENT REQUEST WHERE IF NO REPLY IN 7 DAYS WILL TAKE MATTERS INTO MY OWN HANDS. Ms Smith as regulations has been asked to correct medical records which she has now after nearly a year agreed to do, there was no need for proceedings. . We may ask as waste of trust money, why not done nearly a year ago, as request to process application for travel expenses. She is so corrupt that she states unaware what records you wanted amending, but CITING them in her defence to my claim. With Tomlin order I could go back to the court if defendants, go back on their word, reason Smith refused to sign, and made her own nonsense consent form. In template Smith I state for example I will not get a reply, confirming now she refuses to correct medical records. This is a stance she has taken from day one, its a power matter. In defence to AOIBS746 states I do not know what records he wants correcting, but quotes them in her defence. After AOIBS746, hides behind court order, saying she has no comment to make, where the NHS OWN document states, she must amend the medical records, via template Smith confirms she will not amend medical records, eg state if not done in,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,days would assume refusal to do, amount of time extended on request. . Other issue in template Smith, is the issue the defendants left me clinically in. I am in pain, have disability in movement of arm, for example can not wash properly, however defendants will not answer question over failure to treat. They have stance we will not release our correspondence with surgeons over missing medical records, unless surgeons say you can have it, I believe utterly unreasonable, however in template Smith ask for HER correspondence only to surgeons, where via non reply, confirms she will not supply, or alter medical records etc. I am in pain, they have made me disabled, I can not even wash properly, due to restrictions in arm movement, as in spiteful way, refuse to treat, because I had shown Packham dishonest, I had contacted him, the BT phone records confirm this. My GP states if they refuse to treat, I have no other options, so continue disabled.
6/ Plan therefore to expose this petty/corrupt trust. Smith works in out building of defendants, to remind her of the state her trust had left me in was going to smash a window, at entrance to her place of work, get arrested, hope a surgeon in another part of country would correct my disability. Took padded gloves, to ensure not injured when I smashed windows. Had a rethink on way to hospital , left bus, then from library computer records of that afternoon, and email sent, rejected plan, went now to confront Packham, defendants CTV confirms to police ,entering MAIN hospital, not outbuilding where Smith works, understand defendants confirmed to police,this fact, could not find Packham, so went to confront Smith, over failure to treat, hoped to get arrested as refusal to leave Smiths office. There were 2 woman in doorway, so walked around back, where ironically slipped and cracked a window, which was already broken, had no gloves on and cracked a window, handed myself in at local police station, put on bail, told what I have heard you will not have your day in court. . The police initially stated they would take no action, however my only option to get treatment, if arrested, while at station, deduced this could have been obtained, going to main hospital handing out flyers, informing people what was going on, trust asking me to leave, refused, arrested, get matter to the general public. [police are not taking any action, case closed]
7It is now 31.7.2015, DJBrittan in order states, Ms Smith document to settle will not be accepted by the court, and demands a hearing. I told her when she rejected Tomlin order, that consent order to settle, made no sense, and utter nonsense which she insisted was used, DJBrittan confirms its utter nonsense. In new application, I ask again for replies to court order applications. I assume via order of DJBrittan, Smith now contacts me saying she will correct medical records, however in previous template Smith via non reply, confirms she would go back on her word, reason I reacted. It is of interest, the issue of refusal to treat, leaving me disabled, NOT MENTIONED, clearly she wants me disabled. This is person I am dealing with. We have asked again via template Smith for information,on the 1.8.2015, no reply. The problem we have, we have Ms Smith having been sent template Smith, she has no intentions of replying ,then complain as I react to situation, eg I issue proceedings. She is so corrupt she then goes to the court complaining because I issued proceedings. In all cases as defined in template Smith all she had to say, in email, one line ",,,,,,," give us until ",,,,,,". Of interest Smith given 28 days to confirm negligence, or start protocol proceedings for damages, no reply, every other template Smith, she has ignored, eg its not a deadline, all she had to say in email ",,,,," give us a little more time.
8/ We had for over 3 months abdominal problem, with pain also in right shoulder. Defendants believe a stomach mucosa problem. I am banned from Southmead, return to later. Severe pain, while at Filton library, so catch bus to the infirmary, BRI. On the bus collapse, plead with ambulance staff not to take me to Southmead hospital, although hospital could be seen from bus. Taken to the BRI, where if you had a textbook on how to treat patients , they would not tick all the boxes but would give even more. Every time while admitted for 3 days,,,,,,,,,,,, asked if in pain, introduced by name, told why procedures were taken place. There were 4 beds in room, after taking bloods, i was talking to other patients shaking my head. Where later a member of staff asked what was wrong. I had to explain i was living in a different world, as BRI staff were perfect, i was shaking my head over utterly unprofessional staff at Southmead, eg discussing patient by name in front of me ect. .
9/ We now move on to red card issued by Southmead. What are reasons, i committed criminal damage, they even made this allegation to my GP. This is libel, the police are taking no action, no case to answer as they accepted from DAY 1. . This aspect is now dropped. However they state you threatened physical violence towards staff, i have recordings can they state in 7 days who was threatened, and what was threat. We have Ms Jones stating you used derogatory statements to staff, and quoted one. I did call Ms Smith a bitch, and i APOLOGISED TO HER, a long time ago, IMMEDIATELY . Correlated word. with gripping/malicious and these words used, . Ms Jones states i use the word now, gripping, malicious in correspondence to the court. Lets put cards on the table, we know,,,,, have Ms Needs saying we were misleading the court , i was not on holiday, i did see your email, 13,7.2014, we knew if we did not reply you would issue proceedings, 1.8.2014. Ms Smith then goes to court gripping, in a malicious way, complaining to DJWatson as i issued proceedings. Further she states i threatened staff, we asked in 7 days, who was threatened, and what was threat, no one was ever threatened with violence. We have Ms Jones as a utterly bully threatening court action if website is not taken down. She needs from above to put her own house in order, for example THEY ARE involved in fraud over my travel expenses. Fraud is defined as depriving someone of his property,the trust even not only refused to pay travel expenses , but goes to the court asking for costs. There is no allegations against Ms Needs, as recorded delivery not signed for by her, this made clear in numerous emails to defendants. If defendants want tone of website decreased i suggest they start issuing some apologises. As legal advice will now talk to ombudsman. Ms Jones wants to be judge and jury , lets put evidence to a non bias person, Ms Needs asked if she wanted to hear recording of what really went on, of course the trust do not want to know. They need at end of day to put their own house in order from recordings, acute abdomen ,please see 10/
10/ a/ Trust A/E do not know what is wrong.[3 visits] ,,,,,,,,,,,,,last visit
b/ Given food to eat. Pain returns, nurse states i will inform doctor, we ask did she do this.
c/ So in pain, they do not know what is wrong, however at 4.00 am as an old age pensioner told to walk 4 miles home.From recording in tears as in pain as I left.
[compare with BRI ,,,,,not going home until we know what is wrong]
We now move to 7.9.2015 obtain letter from Ms Jones. So now we have new position, no issue over damage/derogatory comments but still maintain staff threatened with violent. We have asked what alleged threats, and who were they made to. Of course Ms Jones can not answer question. I ask the reader to draw their own conclusion.Asked ombudsman to investigate ban.
11/ Now move onto 9.9.2015. I told Ms Smith consent order was nonsense to settle issue over medical records, confirmed by DJBrittan, so due to her utter incompetence in forming order i have to attend court. We have the playground bully, Ms Smith trying to shout me down, utterly bad manners of the gutter, where she is reprimanded by DJWatson, let him speak, he did not interrupt you when you were speaking. She makes statement that she had settled after over a year, AOIBS746 ,and medical records corrected, . What was sole issue of AOIBS746. From NHS Choices document she MUST allow me to add a statement to wrong medical records, document in last year, sent nearly 30 times, she has only complied in last few days to alter records. Lets recap, claim made, where Ms Smith states, in defence we do not know what records he wants altered, then quotes them in her defence, she will go to any length to mislead the court. Vast majority of request, to alter just ignored, however use email Feb 2015 ,where we do get a reply, she refuses to let me add a statement, so she is aware from people she works for, NHS, she MUST allow me to add a statement to medical records however refuses to allow me to add a statement. Now in July 2015 ask to settle,and now after over a year, state she will put statement in my medical records. Asked a friend looking at file to estimate legal costs since Feb 2015. We have estimate of over 1000.00. As he said difficult we have just had court hearing, not only Ms Smith ,but an unknown male of defendants also in court, as my friend said we do not know pay scale of this person. Ms Smiths pay scale also unknown , just of course estimated. We may ask on the 3.7.2015 they ask to settle all issues, why not done in Feb 2015, in that letter itemised items, given a utter climb down on the 3.7.2015 , where EVERYTHING i asked for she now supplies after 7 month delay, a waste of NHS money .
12/ We now move on to trust letter of the 11.9.2015, over complaint. As in shoulder problem, trust ignores evidence in front of it and calls black is white. Previously stated I had not contacted Mr Packham, where I sent and trust requested, copy of BT phone records which showed call from my landline, to Mr Packhams . So CEO has phone records however in report states I had not contacted him. Can I please quote from new complaint, quoted in trust reply.You feel the trust was wrong to discharge you home without transport as you were still experiencing symptoms that had returned and which did not subside fully until 6.30 am. There is no mention in report of this. Again want to sweep under the carpet, when evidence shows a problem. Consider events of that evening, again severe abdominal pain. This is not a cardiac issue, no SOB, pulse full and regular. Dr Aldridge goes along line it was a cardiac issue, a right zebra with symptoms, and presentation before at this hospital. We have nurses talking to you, with clear view they wish they were elsewhere do not introduce themselves or inform what is going on, for example again recorded,,,,,,,,,,,,,I need blood from you. I was getting agitated as appalling clinical behaviour. Complain as she had to use hand for bloods, as from clinical notes, could not use cubital fossa. So when I saw doctor, said I assume I will be here for some time, and he confirmed we will take me home afterwards. We had talked before, so knew my background, where from recording he states,,,,you know procedure we wait 4 hours before new bloods to monitor Troponin 1. He had not explained also what was going on, however I accept from conversation knowing my background I can understand why he had not outlined procedure, no complaint. He is aware of abdominal pain, pain sometimes in these presentations, in R shoulder, and lateral border of thorax at about T6 level. .Further indicated had obtained brown pigmentation on skin,,,,,,,,,,,,bilary problem? I was just utterly frustrated , I was ill, previous presentations to trust had not diagnosed problem, we had nurses treating you like dirt. Its like as a tennis coach, you see someone else coaching,where you consider if steps appropriate. For example in this case,,,,,,,,,,,,,i want some blood, never saying why required, and nurse never introduce themselves. Now waiting for second Troponin 1 sample given a sandwich where pain returns. Told nurse , recorded where she said i will inform doctor. I knew was not a cardiac problem. So we have asked trust did nurse inform doctor. So told to walk nearly 4 miles home, trust aware pain has returned and they do not know cause, or care. From recording crying as in pain as I left defendants. . On way home curled up on wall as in severe pain, where police/surcurity want to know why on wall. This is not a thorax problem, Dr Aldridges recommendations however not acted upon by my GP. Via my letter GP reconsiders evidence and trust told by GP their proposed recommendations would not be required. I suggest in letter a D/D of liver/gallbladder problem, reason GP asks for ultrasound of these structures. Its of concern I suggested this D/D to GP, while doctor at hospital did not even consider. We then from above have collapse on bus, as again in same severe pain, where BRI confirm my D/D and admitted for 3 days. We await trust response to question, which we know today,,,,,,,,,,we will not reply . From above we have utter incompetence of defendants. Can I refer to their letter 11.9.2015 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,he left department not taking copy of your CAD [coronary artery disease ] document,,,,,,,,,,,,,told to see GP to explore options for further investigations for CHEST pain. This was never a cardiac issue,chest pain, and GP ignored ,as previous trust recommendations. . In reply to complaint which stated,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,still expericing symptoms that had returned in A/E and which did not reside fully until 6.30.at home ,,,,,,,,,,,Defendants as normal ignore complaint, refuse to answer complaint, issue template Smith, as usual no reply refuse to answer complaint, official complaint to NHS ombudsman therefore.. Ms Jones makes libellous comments to my GP, again we reported this time to NMC. This is not a vindictive attack on defendants, on initial contact with A/E can only be described as excellent service. I even went to A/E to leave a thank you letter for consultant , who treated, however problem as told we have several consultants and do not know who to send to. This was a presentation with severe abdominal pain. Lets consider a book I use regularly Medical list for examinations, which are just list, from most likely to other options. Eg Maligant disease of lung, bronchial Ca ,,,,squamous 35 percent,,,,,,,,,,,,down to carcinoid cylindromata [rare]. What did it state about Main causes of acute abdomen,,,,1/ inflammation,,,,,,,,,acute appendicitis ,,,,,,,acute CHOLECYSTITIS..under 7/ Extra abdominal ,,,,MI .Consider book used by medical students in Bristol, Kumar/Clark where MI from table never postulated as cause of acute abdominal pain. They were told in recent attacks pain also in R shoulder and lateral border of thorax at about T6. From medical records of my GP, I MADE D/D of CHOLECYSTITIS which is disgraceful that defendants never considered, . We have trust further, although they do not want to answer complaint, I am given cheese sandwich, [fat content] where pain returns, record conversation with nurse where told pain had returned, she states will inform doctor. So we have a trust, who knows I am in pain, they do not know cause of pain, but told although in pain to walk nearly 4 miles home. From above trust considered a cardiac issue, in pain, told to walk home. Severe attack on the 22.9.2015, readmitted to the BRI. Via temporary relief some gallstones removed via ERCP, with later surgical appointment to remove gallbladder in next few weeks. As indicated this could have been diagnosed a long time ago if competent staff at this trust. ITS AN ISSUE THEY NEVER CONSIDERED until I put forward D/D which GP agreed was a possible cause, and asked defendants to do a ultrasound. Again 3 days in BRI again excellent care, you can always see good medical practice,,,,,,,,,,,,,I am ,,,,,,,,,I am a ,,,,,,,nurse, can I please take blood from you, we need for,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. Compare with Southmead , hell,recorded on tape, ,,,,,,,,,,I need some blood from you, nurses by name talking about patients in front of me ect. We have recording with trust Registrar who came to take blood sample, as every nurse male/female could not obtain a sample. As he confirms , my views, all attempts not in vein, but side of vein. This trust utterly incompetent. We ask Ms Smith to look at medical records, eg did Dr Aldridge ask for LFTs, first thing BRI looked at, as considering cholecystitis ,again refuse to let me look at medical records, she will go to any length to hide facts,. Its disgraceful we had to use the IC to get wrong medical records altered, trust would never have altered if not for IC, similarly we need ombudsman to get reply to present complaint, as trust refuse to answer, eg did nurse inform doctor, after eating, pain had returned. Further later Ms Jones refuses to answer question, ,,,,,,,,,,who was threatened with violence, and what was threat, THERE WAS NO THREAT . It shows her character she makes allegations with no evidence , makes libellous allegations, confirmed by police, but refuses to remove them, again reason we have to take to the NMC. Its summarized with comment of BRI ,,,,,this clinical issue should have been resolved a long time ago.Trust informed of ombudsman/NMC complaint, they can produce a reply, so in time although they refuse to supply to me, i can obtain via third party, similarly with IC where although they utterly refused to do, eg for example correct medical records,when IC involved give me everything i requested OVER A YEAR IN TIME. We may ask why not done over a year ago. No one wants to go to hospital , however if you have to go , some hospitals you do not want to visit, and you have choice i recommend BRI, excellent care, and i know when gallbladder removed in next few weeks [some trust people believed a cardiac issue] i will get excellent clinical care. This is really summed up, told to walk over 3 miles home, in so much pain curled up on wall, where police/surcurity have to take action. The issue summed up in call from BRI [28.9.2015] where admissions told to look out for a cancellation so i can get surgery asap, and asked if i could in , 24 hours notice, come for surgery, if space available, a trust doing everything to resolve clinical issue, where Southmead utterly could not care less when visited.
OMBUDSMAN EMAIL 28.9.2015. I do not understand emails as it states give trust more time. For example as legal advice, AF127669 looks final response to me. Well lets give trust another go to answer complaint. This is a red card . We have asked trust to confirm details of allegations, which is utterly devoid of fact, which I understand is a human rights issue as trust refuse to supply details of allegations. . We have allegations of criminal damage, which were dismissed by the police. From legal advice, trust have had more than enough time, withdraw allegations or start a private criminal prosecution. Secondly threats of violence towards staff, utterly untrue, what were dates, who was threatened with violence , and what was threat. Thirdly derogatory statements about trust, via bullet points again what are these. We know for example surgeon Mr Packham dishonest, saying I had never contacted his office, while BT phone records show I had.We have trust whitewash report, where they have BT records, however maintain I had not contacted his office, you can not deal with a trust who wants to call black is white. We know trust lawyer, Ms Smith, whining to the court as I issued proceedings, saying trust unaware of claim, this was utterly malicious , further misleading the court, as Ms Needs confirms the trust stance untrue, she did see email, she was not on holiday. This was confirmed from consultant I was working for, via his investigations. We need via bullet points, what are these allegations, over threats of violence , and derogatory statements. Is it true for example trust sending letters with no stamps on, they have my website,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,what facts are untrue. This is a case where Ms Jones will not, can not answer my inquiry. What are your allegations, please cite, most we have third party evidence, via recordings. . Again in AF127779 ,the trust do not want to answer complaint. Ms Roost cites complaint, in her letter before ombudsman , while in A/E pain returned, you informed nurse, recorded conversation, who stated she would inform doctor. A simple question did she inform doctor. The implications clear, doctor does not know cause of pain, [although I DIAGNOSED PROBLEM CONFIRMED BY MY GP no help from GP], trust believed a cardiac issue, however was prepared to discharge, and for me to walk home. Never told from recording I could stay until buses were running, utterly as medical advice a nonsense, he does not know cause of pain , but was prepared to discharge, INMATERIAL if stated wait till buses start running. .We have me walking home in so much pain curled up on wall where police/surcurity ask what is wrong. Compare with BRI ,,,,,,,,,,,you will be admitted until such times we determine issue. This trust utterly no thought to safety of patient. Could be nurse forgot to inform doctor, from above utterly incompetent, if this is case no surprise, just want to know trust stance, they know complaint QUOTED in trust reply, however do not want to answer, did nurse inform doctor, back in pain again ,as admitted to A/E.
We now move to the 2.10.2015. Ms Needs replies that we will get a reply to my numerous complaints, on the 5.11.2015, for the NHS ombudsman. So we will get a reply ,,,,,,,,,,did nurse inform doctor [as recorded] after given sandwich that pain had returned, pain relating to eating, surely doctor is driven in direction for cause of abdominal pain. From medical records presentation of acute abdominal pain, however wanted to go in unrelated area, cardiac issue.. From reply then and only then can I make next steps. As stated this draft made many months ago, Ms Needs will to reply to request for data. Secondly Ms Jones will list when/what were threats of physical violence towards staff, we have recording of 11.6.2015 where no threats of physical violence, confirmed in medical records. We have asked Ms Smith to look at next, FINAL visit medical records, which she refuses to let me see. This time we have complete recording, allegations of criminal damage, told not so, [later confirmed by the police, no case to answer please go away ] ,where told I am not interested. Where told not to make untrue allegations, where told again, not interested wait outside. Concluded with threat to report her to Ms Needs in complaint department. So we await Ms Jones allegations of threating physical violence to staff, as her allegations, of criminal damage, and derogatory statements in this site. [FREE SPEECH] We ask trust for medical records of this last visit, if nurse have falsified medical records , stating she was threatened with physical violence I will get her struck off. WE HAVE FULL RECORDING This is same miserable trust, knowing I was back in identical pain, do not know cause of pain, and informing me to walk home, again from recording, as told to leave , and as I kick door, crying, I indicate ,,,i am in so much pain, these bloody morons do not know cause of pain and told to walk home, all recorded on tape. We have me lead on wall walking home in severe pain, where police/surcurity ask me what I am doing. Its of concern, and great worry of what may have occurred walking home, THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT WAS WRONG. Appendicitus , burst while lead on wall..........Later it was me who made possible diagnoses , which GP confirmed as a strong option, and scan done at this trust, which I thank them for, . It’s a worry the doctor at trust could not diagnose problem, although I was able to do so. We have via GP/correspondence to MP, found a solution to impingement of shoulder which for no reason trust refused to treat. Can I again refer [2014] correspondence with Ms Needs asking to confirm again I required a different surgical team to Mr Packham who maintained I had not contacted his office, over incompetence at physiotherapy , where he and trust has phone records of BT. In trust whitewash report it states you had not contacted ,where it has BT phone records from my landline to him, utterly corrupt. She then states the trust has no comment to make, over request for new surgical firm. . Mr Packham agrees in previous correspondence that delay although too long in giving surgery, this booking is nothing to do with him. So we come to nearly a year, [which makes nonsense of trust stance ,,,,,,,,,,treat in 16 weeks] before surgery offered. My GP believed he had no options, as he must refer to CATS again [a organisation that states not qualified to treat you, going on course to allow me to inject corticosteroids into shouder] then I must use this trust. Where Ms Needs confirms in 2014 refusal to treat, you have Packham only option. Again from regulations they would not offer surgery in 16 weeks, which leaves loophole, to go elsewhere , as Dr Paul stated your so content at BRI [CONFIRMED MY DIAGNOSES WHICH TRUST WERE UNABLE TO DO utterly incompetent ] will try to get one of their surgeons to see you.
Iwill never forgive this corrupt trust, nearly all summer in pain and unable to diagnose what was wrong, its not like they had only one go, even had consultant involved in first visit. However as indicated before he did consider some options, however in final visit, indicated in some attacks pain in R shoulder. From basic embryo anatomy, he should have considered migration of structures, as i did, in development ,,,,,,gallbladder,,,,,,,,,,Dr Paul GP agreed reason trust asked to do scan. Why could this miserable trust not diagnose problem. We await if doctor told pain had returned , and Ms Jones giving in bullet points time/date and what are allegations of threats of physical violence, and derogatory statements. Further does she still maintain i caused criminal damage, an issue further the NMC are looking at. We await medical records of final visit.
12/The above on internet now for nearly a year, under www.cooruptionincourtsystem.co,. Of course trust do not issue litigation over site,all facts correct, and again from above NO QUESTIONS ANSWERED. We move to litigation claim. Ms Smith informed of claim and acting in person, as legal advice, told you have a claim, however quantum not large enough for us to take on. Did not know that claims in small claims only under 1000.00 quantum, as advice on a bad day may not get 1000.00. From Protocol trust must send me Protocol document, however refuse to do, although requested numerous times. We know background of HHJDenyer from www.corruptionincourtsystem.com. who will go to any length to frustrate the judicial process, eg removing documents from file , ignoring request in court applications, some further evidence above. From call ,,,,,the court has been out to get you for sometime,,,,.Although i have not heard from trust in negligence claim, knew they would reject claim , quoted in this site, many weeks age before reply. . Denyer had stated I required to ask his permission before proceedings could be issued, because of previous claims.
Lets consider why order made, he quotes DENYER 1 AND 2 ABOVE. Well I appealed DJWatsons order as medical records were not complete, TRUST ADMIT THIS as supplied in final settlement. Every right to appeal. Secondly because of issue of AOIBS746, as I appealed being struck out. Of course Denyer knows this was an abuse, from trust defence, in previous claim, from Struart v Goldberg [2007] EWCA Civ 1 they had accepted claim under new regulations, further assume binned AGAIN he had refused to answer court application to amend POC, or withdraw and reissue. Lets consider the actual claim, to add a statement to my medical records, which in final settlement trust concede they had to do, and not returning tickets so I could be paid was no more than fraud. He quotes further the case v Compuwave. They produce a computer program that THEY ADMIT DID NOT WORK AND THEREFORE NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE. I HAD EVERYRIGHT TO ISSUE PROCEEDINGS WHERE AGAIN CORRECT PROGRAM SUPPLIED AND THEY ASK TO SETTLE. WE DESIGN TOMLIN ORDER WHERE EVERYTHING AGREED. DJWATSON ASKS WHAT WAS POSITION IN COMPUWAVE OF PERSON WHO SIGNED SETTLEMENT.
LATER YES LATER THE CLAIM IS STRUCK OUT THE COURT UTTERLY CORRUPT THE CLAIM SETTLED REQUEST OF COMPUWAVE. ONLY ISSUE WHO SIGNED SETTLEMENT
13/ Lets summarize,,,,,,, claim OBS08441 we know documents taken by hand stamped/dated by court as delivered to the court removed from file to pervert the course of justice, WE KNOW FROM CALL THE COURT OUT TO GET YOU FOR SOMETIME
2BS03757,,,,this is identical claim to OBS08441, an abuse of process. We know from claim, POC,,,,On the ,,,,i sent,,,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,of,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and claiming under 7.4 RM regulations . We know not immune from procedings. We have N460 saying not immune and the POC does not state on the,,,i sent,,ect which is utter nonsense. DJBrittan knows he can say any nonsense, which Denyer did in request for oral hearing , all of them including later ones from Administration court orders. We know applications made, my copies stamped by the courts however the corrupt courts state not made.
Now in negligence claim left disabled , ask Denyer to issue proceedings which puts in bin, further emails confirm the corrupt court will not reply
P JONES
CASE NUMBER CI/2013/2749 JONES V BRISTOL CC ROYAL MAIL [RM] GROUNDS FOR APPEAL
1/ Can i please refer to application where we awaited transcripts so my barrister could prepare bundle for hearing, which would expand grounds for appeal, this document in full must be part of bundle, prepared by the court lawyer, to save his/her index in this document have used references a, b, c,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,z, za.Can i please assume the court refuses to supply a transcript, as i requested, for barrister. We have the utter nonsense now where RM say in 2014 claim 2YJ03757 should have been paid, we accept evidence you supplied, UPOV we will accept as proof of value. So we know if we can get a oral hearing , RM admit my claim. These 3 pages just give basic facts , followed by skeletal argument, full details section
The N460 page 39 ,HHDJB,,,,this claim easy to make, nothing in any documents to show on the,,,,,,,,,,,,,he sent,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,,and regulations he was claiming under, untrue please see POC page 44 , admitted in defence to the POC, page 45-47. THE POC CLAIM MADE IDENTICAL AS HE REQUIRED SO SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STUCK OUT CPR 1.3 3.
Immune from proceedings untrue, please see 3/ below RM agreed i could recover loss in court proceedings, please see pages a-d. This has been true since 2003 6 cases before the court since 2003. If untrue why have RM not raised in last 15 years. In 0BS08441 ,,,,,HHDJWatson,,,,any legal issues you want to raise,,,,no.
Further i had not insulted the court if we had a transcript the court refused to give me a defence in 0BS08441, please see my frustration in page h stamped by the court,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i might as well collect leave to appeal papers now. Documents had been removed from my file, ,,,,HHDJWatson ,,something very odd here. It could be understood, if i had said,,,,,,,,,,HHDJWatson had removed, the courts corrupt, please see letter to HHDJWatson as he struck out in papers, page 40 , before this he stated he would do this if i did not make clear. All i state is facts above, again if we had transcript HHDJBrittan had this letter opened on page 3 BEFORE we started, i had not insulted the court, the court had refused to give me a defence for 0BS08441, and HHDJWatson in transcript admits documents removed from my file, although my copies stamped by the court. My MP who had taken an interest in case wrote to the court over documents missing, all letters ignored. I had not insulted RM, the court has evidence are they saying any nonsense to the court to delay/reject my claims, we have previous judgements,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a defence to waste my time and the district judge, ,,,,,,,,,,,a defence that is incredulous. Were they aware of their reference numbers in 0BS08441, in 2YJ 03757 we know page l sent, referenced in questionnaire page n, from this document l it references letter of the 20.11.2010. Therefore they know on the,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i sent,,,,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i am claiming under your regulations, 7.4. in 7.4 it states we will accept an auction valuation, the auction comes from an auction as i find same item as my lost item, similar condition as my lost item, sold by a third party. A unique proof of value therefore [UPOV]. Now in 2014 page ZA RM state we accept as proof of value. Please read defence page 45-47 did RM write,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,any nonsense in their defence, eg statements they make.
We have no transcript, allegations of dishonesty [Sharing v Preston CC [2012] EWHC 515 ] and threat to not appeal.
Further from 2YJ03757 hearing please see below we had a bias hearing, from HHDJB definition of a bias hearing, therefore from Strickson v Preston CC [2007] EWCA 1132 , we have grounds for a judicial review. Further from the immunity issue, NEVER raised in any form at hearing , clearly he had therefore a closed mind, before hearing, therefore again, Sharing v Preston CC [2012] EWHC 515 Admin we have grounds for a judicial review. He had judged case before hearing,.
Further this is an abuse of process, we have in chronological order, a claim paid , as UPOV accepted as proof of value,. In 0BS08441 say not proof of value reason we were in court, then at hearing offer no defence and admit as proof of value. Claim paid late, email RM, ,,,,,your cheque in post we have report from barrister we have no grounds for an appeal. Claim 2YJ03757 rejected as UPOV is not acceptable as proof of value, i issue proceedings, RM can not answer my application, say we do not understand claim. We have SOLE issue for both hearings is UPOV acceptable as proof of value. From Johnson v GoreWood [2000] there should be finality, and i should not be vexed [UPOV as proof of value], in same matter a second time. From Walbrook v Fattels et al [2007] EWCA Civ 257 ,,,,same identical subject matter [UPOV] where a defence could have been raised in previous claim, at 0BS08441 hearing offered no defence as UPOV was proof of value. At 2YJ03757 hearing i will not consider if an abuse of process, he admits he has not full, original transcripts of court of appeal cases he cites and i will ignore this evidence. [EVIDENCE FROM INTERNET BARRISTERS CHAMBERS SITE]
The court page 37 states i have a remedy, however i had not asked for a oral hearing, this is untrue, 12.10.2010, proof of posting in page 6, application page r-v. Further 3 documents stamped by the court as taken by hand asking for a oral hearing.
While Ashfords lawyers on file, they state we were unaware of orders page 34 35 36 reason we are at the court of appeal
In 2014 RM state that we accept that UPOV is acceptable as proof of value , PAGE ZA , and therefore 2YJ03757 should be paid.
2/ I send about 100 letters/week. The issue before the court was over proof of value. Claims must be made for lost mail on form page f, we have had a defence to page f by RM saying, my details and where sent was not on form, or illegible, however these quoted in reply to page f rejecting my claim over proof of value. RM have said we will write any nonsense to you or the court to reject/delay your claims. Therefore since 2009 , quoted in the POC, and i send a typed copy of page f, with my claim, which i use as part of my POC , if claim rejected, eg page 44 today. The issue of proof of value quoted in RM regulations 7.4, page e, under 7.4 where it states an auction valuation will be acceptable as proof of value, quoted in page 44 which is the POC. I have items left to me by my late father, if lost i look on Ebay [ an auction] find same item, similar condition as my lost item, sold by a third party, and use Ebay auction page, called screenshot in RM defence to show item sold and it would show proof of value. Can we please call this a unique proof of value. UPOV, in chronological order, a claim is paid, eg accept UPOV as proof of value, then we have case OBS08441 where RM reject claim, i issue proceedings, say not proof of value, and then at hearing the barrister states we accept as proof of value , no defence offered, and claim paid. We then have todays claim , RM reject claim as UPOV is not acceptable as proof of value, eg want to relitagate OBS08441, and 2YJ03757 is issued. I take in claim loose to postoffice who retain and send to RM, then give me a receipt, in list documents they send to RM, eg page l ,which references letter of the 20.11.2010 , page m, which explains UPOV in detail, in page l, it states same issue as OBS08441. [UPOV rejected as not proof of value] So what 2YJ03757 is a relitagation of OBS08441.
3/ 2YJ03757, is dismissed in the N460, page 39, as HHDJWatson was correct, striking out in papers, CPR1.3.3 , as claim could not be understood, and no documents before the court to show,,,,,,,,,,on the ,,,,,,,,,he sent,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,,and regulations he was claiming under, this was way to make claim, This was as claim made POC page 44, comprehended by RM as all data he alleges not disclosed in the defence page 45-47. We have no transcripts, the issue of immunity from proceedings never raised at hearing in any form. In early 2003 in discussion RM said we can modify regulations as we feel fit, we will allow you to recover your loss in court proceedings, or future claims should they arise. At end of 2003 BS315289, was before the court, defence in page a/b, par 9 confirm,,,,,,,,,,,,,i can recover loss in court proceedings, with my follow up letters with proof of posting page c/d in 2004. We have had 5 cases in last 15 years, of course issue of immunity from proceedings never raised, as in 2YJ03757. HHDJBrittan , again we have no transcript,,,RM have a right to know why they were in court,,,,,its unfair, would show bias if i trawled through papers and presented case for one of the parties , this would mean i am acting as an advocate for that party, this is not the duty of a district judge. But this is what he did, by his own definition, we had a bias hearing, and was acting as an advocate for RM. It follows if a bias hearing, then via Laws LJ Strickson v Preston CC [2007] EWCA 1132 we have grounds for a judicial review, further as issue never raised, he had a closed mind over immunity from proceedings, never put before the court, it follows again grounds via Sharing v Preston CC [2012] EWHC 515 Admin.
3/ As the court page 37 states i have a remedy open to me, however with respect i disagree with HHMr Justice Williams further conclusions. An application made for leave to appeal, rejected in papers 33, the envelope franked 11.10,2010. An application made with letter on the 12.10.2010 , page r-w . [due to computer crash the letter could not be recovered, however in Admin. Court file]. Verbally told out of time, contacted lawyers LyonsDavidson , the court has correspondence, told to make application to the court of appeal, who indicated wrong legal advice , need a judicial review. Protocol letter to HHJDenyer, no reply , so issue judicial review, court order page 38 where i ask again for oral hearing, no reply. So when order page 37, was made i had as the court order stated, a remedy, i had asked 3 times for a oral hearing going back to 12.10.2012. Discussed with court lawyer told to ask again, again these latest 3 applications, taken by hand, my copies stamped by the court.
4/ Contacted lawyers Ashfords jan 2013 to end of july 2013. They then indicated we no longer wish to act, i make a complaint to ombudsman whose report states, poor service , and partial refund, in report,,,,we have full file, we accept however that orders, 34 35 36 were not obtained by Ashfords. Further Ashfords maintain they were not informed, as i explained in my application, we were in late july 2013 discussing document for chambers, however in 12.6.2013 there was a judicial review hearing.which Ashfords maintain they were not aware of. Further in OBS08441 we know documents taken by hand ,my copies stamped by the court had been removed from file. In respect to asking for a oral hearing we have evidence of 4 applications to the court, verbally told only one on system, told HHJDenyer replied to all your request for a oral hearing, [no], asked 11 times for confirmation, all letters ignored, please see y stamped by the court 27.8.2013.
5/ As legal advice if another claim arises claim under UPOV, which i did, a recorded delivery which was not signed for after i sent, page z, which was paid, accepted as proof of value, with follow up correspondence in page ZA where RM state yes, we accept as proof of value, therefore claim 2YJ03757 should be paid.
PLEASE SEE FUTURE PAGES ENCLOSED BELOW
COURT OF APPEAL JONES V BRISTOL COUNTY COURT [ROYAL MAIL RM ]C1/2013/2749
COURTS ORDER OF 17.3.2014 -----DOCUMENT FOR BUNDLE---FINAL DOCUMENT FOR JUDGEMENT
INTODUCTION
1/ With reference to my email to the court of the 19.3.2014, enclosed, please find document for file to go with bundle produced by the court. I send about 100 letters/week. The cases v RM relate SOLELY to dispute over proof of value, of lost item. In this case we have an unique proof of value [UPOV],which was rejected by RM in 2YJ03757 , as not acceptable as proof of value , reason we were in court. In recent claim,[2013 Nov] i submit UPOV as proof of value of my lost item, which was paid, with follow up correspondence in 2014 , RM state 2YJ03757 your claim should have been paid as we accept now ,we were wrong and UPOV is acceptable as proof of value, details below.So the claim made in 2YJ03757 RM admit now should have been paid. To save index produced, i have used references a b,,,,,,,,,,,,,,z, za. for this document. From initial application it was made clear, application on time, now seeking barristers advice , we have been awaiting transcripts so he could produce bundle. Can i please refer to Lord Goldrings judgement, that an appeal court utterly legally flawed hearing a case without a transcript. Can i give one example, by his own definition in 2YJ03757 , HHDJBrittan,,,,,,,,,,HHDJWatson was correct striking out this claim in papers , page 40 , as RM have a right to know why they are at court, its unfair , would show bias if i trawled through papers presenting case for a party, this would mean i am acting as an advocate for that party, this is not the duty of a district judge. This is exactly what he did, please see N460 page 39, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,RM are immune from proceedings. If we had a transcript, an issue NEVER RAISED IN ANY FORM AT HEARING. In early 2003 had a claim rejected over a damaged parcel contents, a parcel sent to me, in discussion with RM legal department, , we believed it was not packed properly , and we can modify numerous regulations, for example s89,,,,,,,,,,,,,,amend regulations as we feel fit, to allow you to recover your loss in court proceedings now or if any future claims arise . I had a replacement SAME PACKING so no litigation issued. At end of that year we had case BS315289 , the defence in page a/b, par 9 confirms this,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i can recover loss in court proceedings . I was still concerned with defence, contacted a newspaper, with RM saying read par 9 we state you can recover loss in court proceedings. To confirm this is my letter page c, with proof of posting page 4, dated 7.1.2004. We have had 5 cases since then, FIRST thing HHDJBrittan asked, how many claims v RM in last 15 years, 5, so he knew not immune from proceedings.
By his own definition we had a bias hearing, he had acted as an advocate for RM, Strickson v Preston CC [2007] EWCA 1132, he had trawled through papers, and presented case for RM. There is very little difference between defence in 2YJ03757 page 45-47 and defence for BS315289 page a/b, except in BS315289 RM confirm as always been the case, i can recover loss in court proceedings. This was an issue NEVER raised at hearing. It therefore follows he had a closed mind over evidence, he had judged case before hearing, Sharing v Preston CC [2012] EWHC 515 Admin.
2/ Claims for lost mail must be made on form page f , in a previous defence stated my details and where sent either not legible or not disclosed on page f, so now always send a typed copy, which if required can be used as part of the POC, eg page 44 . I take in documents loose to a postoffice who retain and give me a receipt of what they send to RM. You need to show proof of value of lost item, from regulations 7.4, page e it shows evidence required in support of a claim for compensation, where an auction valuation is acceptable, These are items left to me by my late father, so if lost, i find same item as my lost item, similar condition as my lost item, now being sold by third party on Ebay, as long as it sales we have an auction proof of value, which via 7.4 they will accept as proof of value. In chronological order this UPOV, eg finding on Ebay, same item/similar condition, accepted as proof of value. In OBS08441 we have hearing as UPOV not acceptable as proof of value, then at hearing, [reason for transcript] offer no evidence and accept as proof of value. Discuss with RM appeal section PRP told UPOV is acceptable as proof of value. [however please see below] 2YJ03757 is identical, legal issue, to OBS08441 , not only claim form, copy of claim form, page 44 sent to RM,which is part of the POC page 44, but postoffice confirm page l was sent, which references letter of the 20.11.2010, in page m. In page m its clear proof of value over UPOV, in page l ...........................in respect to a court hearing OBS08441 we have same issue from claim form not a Ebay claim but using auctioneer valuation as proof of value. This is identical to 0BS08441. I had internet barristers chambers article on abuse of process, , extension of Hendersonv Henderson [1843] 3 Hare , where it stated now we required a broad merit based approach, this is an issue where UPOV paid, later OBS08441 where they accept UPOV as proof of value, offer no defence at hearing, PRP inform RM we accept as proof of value, in 2YJ03757 now try to relitagate UPOV is not proof of value. There were quotes,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Johnson v GoreWood [2000]UKHC 65 ,,,parties should not be vexed in same subject matter [UPOV as proof of value ] a second time when issue determined by the court. Walbrook v Fattels et al 2009 EWCA Civ 257 ,,,,,same subject matter [UPOV as proof of value] where defence could have been raised before, THEY OFFERED NO EVIDENCE as UPOV in OBS08441 now say not acceptable as proof of value. HHDJBrittan ,,,i will not consider OBS08441, or this barristers chambers article, i have asked him twice he admits he has not the original full transcripts of the court of appeal judgements. Now we have latest claim page z, UPOV accepted as proof of value to my surprise, in follow up correspondence,page za where RM make clear not only we were right to pay this latest claim, but UPOV is acceptable as proof of value. Therefore this claim should be paid. We have the N460 page 39,,,,HHDJWatson was right striking out page 40 as claim could not be understood. CPR 1.3.3 The judge then gives model on way claim should be made on the,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,he sent,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and regulations he was claiming under, this is the POC page 44, and all this data quoted in the defence page 45-47 as comprehended from the POC.
3/ Seek leave to appeal, rejected in papers page 33, envelope dated 11.10.2012, court maintains out of time, application made on the 12.10,20012 , please see page 6 the court has proof of posting of application, page s to w, with letter to HHJDenyer. [ i have lost letter via computer crash, will not now open, however letter filed in the Administration court]. Contacted lawyers LyonsDavidson as we could not get a oral hearing, told to make application under, CPR52.3 [4] to the court of appeal, who stated wrong legal advice you need a judicial review.
4/ Vis protocol for the JR wrote to HHJDenyer, as no reply issued the JR with court order page 38, where i asked again for a oral hearing , no reply. I then get court order page 37, where i discuss with court lawyer at the Administration court, told to ask again, which i did. These 3 applications taken by hand, my copies stamped by the court. With reference to order page 37,,,,,i had availed my self to a remedy, i had asked on the 12.10.2012, protocol letter, and application 1.2.2013, and i had asked again, all correspondence ignored, with proof of making applications.
5/ Contacted Ashfords [lawyers] Jan 2013 to end of July 2013, preparing papers for chambers, where they stated we no longer wished to act . Ashfords maintain they never obtained orders, 34 35 36, confirmed by ombudsman , who had full file, however they found i had poor service, and partial refund suggested. I contact court lawyer Mr Gardiner who stated only way now was an application to you. This was followed up with RM saying we accept UPOV is acceptable as proof of value. In the N460 it states i insult the court, the facts are in OBSO8441 they refused to give me a defence as did RM. My frustration is shown in letter, page h, as the court can see court stamp 19.8.2011, where i state i might as well collect leave to appeal papers now. First thing at hearing,,,,,,,,,,,,,do you really want to come back, clear breach of the HRA Article 6. We know at least 3 documents stamped by the court had been removed from file, if we had transcript,,,,,something very odd here, would you wait outside so i can photocopy missing documents. I have contacted the court to confirm my 4 applications, i have proof of serving is on court file, they inform me only one. Further Mr Fowler at the court states HHJDenyer answered all your letters for a oral hearing. I HAVE NEVER HAD A REPLY. I have asked him numerous times, for example page y the court can see court dated 27.8.2013 again no reply. Are my applications being removed from file, we know from LyonsDavidson application 12.10.2012 , as told to make application to you, has this been removed,.
THE FACTS [more detail/legal facts]
In Lord Diplocks classification on irrationality,,,,,,,so outrageous in its defiance of logic of acceptable moral standings that no reasonable person who had applied him mind to the question could have arrived at it,,,,,,We have this in the N460 page 39. [The POC page 44 states on the,,,,,,,,,,,,,i sent,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,,and i am claiming under RM regulations 7.4 page e in todays bundle as RM will accept an auction valuation as proof of value , on back of page e under 7.4 ,]the N460,,,,,,,, i agree with HHDJWatson who struck out in papers CPR 1.3.3 that claim could not be understood, and from N460 way to make claim,,,,,,,,,,,on the,,,,,,,,,,,he sent,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,and regulations he was claiming under. This is exactly as claim made , all this data in RM defence page 45-47, eg they know,,,,,,on the,,,,,,,,,,i sent,,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,and regulations i was claiming under. At hearing start from page 44 the POC in bundle page e i refer now from the POC , to 7.4 where it states ,,,we will accept an auction valuation as proof of value, HHDJBrittan states this does not give RM regulations you are claiming under,. In terms of immunity from proceedings AN ISSUE NEVER RAISED IN ANY FORM AT HEARING EG HHDJBRITTAN HAD A CLOSED MIND BEFORE HEARING SHARING V PRESTON CC [2012] EWHC 515 ADMIN. RM had agreed i could in any cases recover loss in court proceedings , later that year in 2003 , BS315289 arose, page today a/b defence par 9, it confirms agreement ,,,i could recover loss in court proceedings, and correspondence page c/d., where page d shows proof of posting of page c sent to RM. We have had 5 cases since BS315289 of course issue never mentioned at hearing. From regulations numerous routes of discretion, eg s89,,,,,,,,,,amend regulations as we feel fit,,,,,,,,,,as chambers indicated, issue never raised at hearing, we do not know claims RM are making. RM client is a legal firm in Bristol , were they aware of agreement,,,,,,,RM wrote to Mr Jones in ,,,,,,,,,recorded delivery,,,,,,,,,,,,,saying this agreement was quashed,,,,,we just do not know. Please see below from HHDJBrittans own definition we had a bias hearing, further i had not insulted the court, these are FACTS ADMITTED BY THE COURT. In OBS08441 the court refused to give me a defence, clear breach of the HRA Article 6. First thing at hearing,,,,,,,,,,,,,,do you really want to come back, sole issue today you have ignored court order reason RM want struck out. I had not ignored court order, the court had stamped my reply to court order, taken by hand my copy stamped by the court. . Numerous documents taken by hand my copies stamped by the court had been removed from file, from hearing HHDJWatson,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,something very odd here, would you wait outside so i can photocopy for court records. In 0BS08441 the item lost is a sports programme, i have no defence. RM barrister states we can not pay for valuables how can i find in over 100 pages of regulations the definition, page j/k. I say all system corrupt, put both hands up, apologise, collect my papers together before walking out, as i was going to the press, would seek leave to appeal, where told to wait. So there is no misunderstanding in todays judgement, did i insult also RM, the Master would have evidence below did RM know their reference numbers in OBS08441, further consider the claim sent to RM in 2YJ03757 , page f, copy of page f, which is page 44, part of the POC, page l,,,,,,,,,,,and consider was defence as they told me,,,,,,,,,,,money no object to us we will write any nonsense to you or the court to delay/reject your claims. For example told not a transaction i made on Ebay,page l , ,,,,told same issue as 0BS08441 , page l , then in defence say we do not know if a Ebay transaction he made. From the POC in OBS08441 , claim 1 ,a recorded delivery to the court, from POC,,,,,,,,,,,,RM replied on the 29.7.2010, this reply in g, our reference number 1-1486629701, claim 2 is ON HER DESK head of legal services,...............i am sending to our appeal department PRP, to prove not proof of value, told to pay claim to me, claim paid. Claim 3 was lost in recording which she would not let me use at hearing,,,,,,,,,,,,,we accept you have proof from postoffice claim made, however we have not original proof of posting of your lost item now f,,,,,,,,,,,,,,off. The claim was misfiled so sole issue at end is UPOV proof of value. There at this early stage, she knows from the POC their reference number, claim 2 on her desk so she knows reference number, claim 3 lost, so no number issued. RM then ask for a court order for me to display their reference numbers.
I wish to put on record that we have asked for a transcript of 0BS08441/2YJ03757 as chambers required before making this application to the court of appeal. It appears now i have to make it. Lord Goldring in judgement ,,,,,,,,,,,a court is legally flawed hearing an appeal without a transcript. The detailed applications for a transcript in section below.
RM can pay compensation for lost mail, it must be made on form, page f in todays document, a typed copy i send to RM also ,as it can be used as part of the POC if required. This has been done as in an earlier defence said my name and where sent not legible, however quoted in initial reply rejecting my claim. Please see 44 , produced by court lawyer ,which was second page of the POC.
For compensation you need to show proof of value, from RM regulations 7.4 page e the court can see RM will accept an auction valuation as proof of value. I send about 100 items/week . I have items left to me by my late father. If lost i find on Ebay an auction same item as my lost item, similar condition as my lost item, being sold by a third party.CAN I PLEASE CALL THIS UNIQUE PROOF OF VALUE [UPOV] , explained in detail page m , which was referenced in initial claim page l,,,,,,can i refer you to my letter to you 20.11.2010. Further in RM book Mail Made Easy they state to summarize official regulations, they need,,,,,,,,,,,,market value,,,,which must be price on Ebay.
In chronological order RM accept UPOV as proof of value and claim paid, then RM will not pay as they will not accept UPOV as proof of value. Then at hearing of OBS08441offer no defence, and accept as proof of value. SOLE ISSUE WHY INITIAL CLAIM REJECTED
RM have an appeal independant section, Postal Review Panel [PRP]. To stop further litigation via email discussed with them if UPOV was acceptable as proof of value, they stated it would be, however i should get letter from third party whose property it was to show item purchased. This communication with a third party is banned under Ebay rules, as i was not involved in auction.
Todays claim 2YJ03757 , again rejected as UPOV was not proof of value, although in discussion the PRP had told them it was acceptable as proof of value. [without the issue of obtaining letter that item sold RM would have been forced to pay claim]The claim is taken in loose to postoffice who gives me receipt of documents in list they retain and forward to RM. For example today the postoffice confirm page f , 44, l ,m, original proof of posting of lost item,and third party Ebay auction advert, called screenshot in defence , showing item/price sold for. was sent to them. Therefore they have claimform, copy page 44 today, which is part of the POC, trade price list, page l,which states same issue as OBSO8441, and i reference letter, which is in page m. Page m, gives in detail the issue of definition of UPOV. So from the POC RM know on the,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i sent,,,,,,,,,,,,,to,,,,,,,,,,,,and i am claiming under your regulations 7.4, an auction valuation. Further know same issue as OBS08441, and explained in detail on page m UPOV, eg i had found same item as my lost item, similar condition as my lost item, sold by a third party on Ebay, and Ebay is an auction. . RM say we do not understand claim and although HHDJWatson heard 0BS08441 5 WEEKS BEFORE he states if i do not make claim clear to him he would strike out. The court on file has my letter, as i state i do not know what to say,, i state,,,,,,,,,RM agree from defence on a set day i sent a 1950 facupfinal programme to Aldridges, you heard OBS08441 5 weeks ago, from above in POC it states claiming under 7.4 regulations as they will accept an auction valuation and again explained UPOV in detail, i find same item as my lost item being sold by third party on Ebay, an auction,,,,,,,,,,. Still struck out page 40.We have the utter nonsense now in the N460 , AS ONE CHAMBERS SAID WHERE ARE WE RUSSIA/CHINA, where HHDJBrittan states,,,,,,,,,,,HHDJWatson was correct the claim easy to make.........on the,,,,,,,,,,,he sent,,,,,,,,,,,,,to ,,,,,,,,,,,and regulations he was claiming under, This is the POC, AND ALL THIS DATA TAKEN FROM THE POC QUOTED IN DEFENCE PAGE 45-48.Again we have no transcript, the issue in the N460 that RM immune from proceedings NEVER RAISED IN ANY FORM AT HEARING. In 2003 RM agreed i could recover loss in any court proceedings ,as they could modify regulations, please see defence to BS315289 par 9 page a/b and correspondence page c/d where d shows proof of posting. The first thing HHDJBrittan asked at hearing how many court cases v RM [ 5] in last 15 years so he knows not immune from proceedings. He states i can not be expected to trawl through papers to see claim, its unfair it would show bias if i trawled through papers, and presented case for one of the parties, this would mean i am acting as an advocate for that party, this is not duty of a district judge. By his own definition we had a bias hearing and he was acting as an advocate for RM. As RM stated you will find we use standard defence, page a/b however as we stated in defence we have discretion , you can recover your loss in proceedings. This was an abuse of process, the issue of UPOV had been again the SOLE ISSUE in OBS08441, WAS IT PROOF OF VALUE. . From Johnson v GoreWood [2000] UKHL 65 there should be finality and i should not be vexed in same matter a second time, an attempt to relitagate in another action ,issues determined by the court is an abuse of process. It would be a travesty of justice to allow matters determined by the courts, to be relitagated.From Walbrook v Fattals et al [2009] EWCA Civ257 ,,,,,,,,,abuse of process by successive actions in respect to same subject matter [UPOV] where claim could have been raised in earlier proceedings . The issue in OBS08441 was is UPOV proof of value, they offered no defence, the barrister accepted as proof of value, now say not proof of value reason we were in court, we want to relitagate OBS08441. . The 2 cases above i have summarized judgement, I had full statements in a chambers internet document, where HHDJBrittan goes to any length to frustrate the judicial process,,,,,,,,,,,i have asked him twice he admits he has not the full/original transcript of these court of appeal cases and i will ignore this evidence. As chambers indicated this is an issue Henderson v Henderson , would any court ask for whole judgement., HHDJBrittan was utterly aware what i was saying,,,,,,,,,,,this was an issue already determined by the courts. The issue of immunity from proceedings never raised at hearing, clearly he had entered hearing with a closed mind, and judged case before hearing. Sharing v Preston CC [2012] EWHC 515 Admin, eg reason for a judicial review.
Leave to appeal, rejected in papers, page 33 envelope franked 11.10.2012 ,verbally the defendants state out of time. From Strickson v Preson CC [2007] EWCA 1132 we have frustration of the judicial process, i could not make application in 7 days, i am allowed a oral hearing,CPR 52.3[4] however on the 12.10.2012 an application made for a oral hearing, page r s t u v w x . The court has in page 6 the proof of posting slip showing application made, RM put on notice application made, i wish to put on record my thanks as RM have not made applications for cost award .[the copy from computer is faint, so have reproduced form ]
Contact lawyers LyonsDavidson who confirms defendants adamant out of time, before 24.10.2012 you need to make application to the court of appeal, CPR 52.3 [4] , as your allowed a oral hearing, the court has Lyons Davidson advice on file, my emails, ,,,,can we do this, i believed only route via a judicial review, the court states,you were correct ,,,, wrong legal advice you need a judicial review.
Protocol letter to HHJDenyer for a oral hearing, no reply, so JR issued. The court issues order page 38 where i ask for a oral hearing again. I then get order page 37 where i discuss with court lawyer. The order had no merit, i had asked on the 12.10.2012 , i had asked via judicial review protocol letter, and again as court order, was told to ask again, again no reply. These 3 applications taken by hand my copies stamped by the court.
As no reply contacted lawyers Ashfords, Jan 2013 preparing document for chambers, then at end of July 2013 said they no longer wished to act. The ombudsman in report,,,,,,,,,,,,,,poor service we suggest a partial refund, in terms of orders page 34 35 36 we accept these were not obtained by Ashfords. Discuss with court lawyer at the Administration court advised only way now application to the court of appeal.I had asked Ashfords to check the 4 applications for a oral hearing , back to 12.10.2012 obtained by the court, as i had asked many times, however no reply.For example did not want defendants to say,,,,,,,,,,LyonsDavidson contacted us , we told them, matter resolved, there was a hearing on the,,,,,,,,,,,and he did not turn up at hearing. Mr Fowler in defendants office states,,,,,,HHJDenyer did not ignore your request for a oral hearing , i have had no replies, numerous emails/letters , eg page y .In July 2013 after Ashfords came off file, i visited the court, told ,,,,we only have one on system, 1.2.2013 So unless informed otherwise it appears 3 of the 4 applications for a oral hearing has been removed from file, as papers admitted by the court had been removed in OBS08441.
Realise new evidence , in 2YJ03757 RM want to relitagate OBS08441, as UPOV would not be accepted as proof of value, so at end of 2013 another claim made over UPOV, page Z , claim PAID , follow up letter page ZA where RM say it is acceptable as proof of value. So they are admitting defence was wrong in 2YJ03757,,,,,,,,,,,IF NOT A EBAY TRANSACTION HE MADE THEN WE DO NOT ACCEPT AS PROOF OF VALUE, PAGE 47 PAR 23. THEY NOW ADMIT 2YJ03757 SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID
TRANSCRIPT.....There are issues where the Master will be angry with me before looking at any papers. As in my previous case v Eaga where all this started as Lord Goldring said, .....although defendants getting verdict wrong this was not a reason for a judicial review , the defendants were utterly legally flawed hearing a case without a transcript , and judicial review award to defendants would be quashed. In terms of transcript today , i have asked the Administration court for a transcript , recorded delivery. Ashfords [ lawyers] while on file, acting Jan 2013-July 2013 made application to defendants, please see page 5 of your bundle, also, where i made application to the court of appeal, and i refer to further correspondence where in her excellent helpful way Miss Jones said i can not see the official form/fee exception documents, please send again, recorded delivery, i see from Royal Mail internet records this application served on the court. Further i refer to correspondence where my barrister wanted transcript so he could advise/prepare papers for Master . So i am forced again to do myself , eg preparation for a bundle, as we have no transcript. Can i explain in just one issue, to show problem for the Master. We have a N460 page 39 where HHDJBrittan states RM are immune from proceedings ,from transcript if we had one,an issue never raised in ANY form at hearing. RM can amend ALL of their regulations as they feel fit, for just one example s89[3] IN FULL [,,adopt such system for determination of charges and other terms and conditions as the universal service provider concerned consider appropriate including determing them itself subject to any conditions and limitations provided for in the scheme. ]and stated if claims should arise i could always recover loss in proceedings, with limitations we agreed, quoted in letter tab c.,proof of posting tab d. When they did at end of that year stated they would allow me ,confirming discretion, to recover my loss in proceedings , please see defence to BS315289 par 9 tab a/b, where RM state i can recover loss in proceedings, and my follow up letter/proof of posting tab c,d dated 7.1.2004. We have had 5 claims in the courts since then, of course issue never raised. Can i please refer to previous claim against RM 0BS08441 where defendants/and the court refused to give me a defence, or regulations they would raise with the court. . RM stated we have appointed a senior barrister, we will be looking for about 2000.00, in cost due to regulations. This was in clear breach of the HRA Article 6 as i had no defence, therefore tab a,b,c.d plus others sent to the court, from transcript,,,,,,,,,,,HHDJWatson,to RM ,,,,,,,,,,any other legal issues you want to raise, no, the claim was paid late, in email correspondence with RM your cheque in post , from barristers advice we have no grounds for an appeal. Again i asked for both of these transcripts. Can i refer to 2YJ03757 transcript. HHDJBrittan,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it would be unfair and would show bias if i trawled through papers, and presented case for one of the parties , this is unfair, and this would mean i am acting as an advocate for that part, this is not the duty of a district judge. By his own definition he is saying we had a bias hearing, the issue of immunity from proceedings never raised at hearing.
It therefore follows if a bias hearing then via Laws LJ Srickson v Preston CC [2007] EWCA 1132 we have grounds for a judicial review, further from Sharing v Preston CC [2012] EWHC 515 Admin had a closed mind , before hearing, as an issue never raised in any form at hearing. HHDJBrittan know RM can amend all regulations however has a closed mind believing RM had not agre ed for me as in defence tab a b ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,to be able to recover my loss in proceedings.
NOTES FOR HEARING 28.8.2012 CASE 2YJ03757
1/ This issue today is an abuse of process trying to relitagate OBS08441.THE ISSUE IN DEFENCE PAR 19,,,,,,,,,,ENCLOSURE EBAY AUCTION SENT AS PROFF OF VALUE,,,,,,,,,,THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUENT PROOF OF VALUE. OBS08441 CAN I PUT IN FRONT OF REFERENCES DOCUMENT CALLED A1 FROM DEFENDANTS BUNDLE FOR THAT HEARING [AS YOU CAN SEE NUMBER 161 IN THEIR BUNDLE] . WHERE THE ISSUE WAS A EBAY PRINT OUT WOULD NOT BE ACCEPTED AS PROOF OF VALUE, AS AN AUCTIONEERS VALUATION. THE COURT FOUND IT DID.
ITS THE SAME ISSUE TODAY PAR 19 OF TODAYS DEFENCE,,,,,,,,,,THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUENT PROOF OF VALUE. Can we put building blocks for today, claim form ]1 2 ] , copy [3] document a guide to football programme prices [4] , and proof of posting of above [ 5]. Can i refer to [6 7] section 3 where i have asked defendants to bring their copy supplied of [4] in claim made against defendants. The implication as indicated before, are you going to say the typed footnote was not in our copy sent with claim form, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,we did not know claim related to OBS08441. We will not know until you ask defendants for copy.
2/ Lets consider todays issue,,,,,,,,,CPR 1.3.3 .........YOU DID NOT GIVE A CONSISE STATEMENT OF FACT IN YOUR CLAIM.
It will help as using regulations of defendants to use their bundle for 0BS08441 , THIS CAN BE SEEN FROM BOTTOM RIGHT HAND CORNER EG 161 ABOVE IN DOCUMENT A , THEIR NUMBER IN BUNDLE FOR THAT HEARING. As in section 1/ list , we have [8 9] EVIDENCE REQUIRED IN SUPPORT OF A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION , AND IN 7.4 EVIDENCE OF THE ACTUAL LOSS MUST BE PROVIDED TO ENABLE RM TO DETERMINE THE VALUE OF THE CONTENTS OF A PACKET SUCH AS
ORGINAL RECEIPTS
PAYPAL RECORDS
AUCTIONEERS VALUATION
LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE.
What does defendants admit, a package sent to Aldridges, which is lost . You make a claim for lost mail as in regulations 7.4 [3] above and therefore claiming as an auctioneers valuation or list not exhaustive, . IS THIS NOT A CONSISE STATEMENT OF FACT. EG YOU ADMIT CLAIM A LOST ITEM, FOR PROOF OF VALUE GOVERNED BY YOUR REGULATIONS 7.4 AND I MAKE CLAIM FROM SECTIONS OF 7.4.
3/ THE EBAY ISSUE
This is just a smoke screen , we do not know if claiming for a transaction you made on Ebay. Can i refer to claim form [1] DOES IT NOT SAY I AM NOT MAKING THIS CLAIM VIA A EBAY TRANSACTION.
4/ CPR 24.2 AS SAME CLAIM AS OBS08441 WE KNOW I HAVE A SUCCESFUL CLAIM
5/ THE CLAIM 0BS08441
The claim was in 3 parts, claim one a recorded delivery bundle to the court which the court said had not arrived. At hearing produced no defence to claim,[will bring orginal defendants bundle for hearing]. Claim 2 again over proof of value. Defendants state to prove we are correct wil send to our appeal department, Postal Review Panel [PRP] who found against defendants. Claim 3 was again a package sent to Aldridges where an Ebay sale , being used as an AUCTIONEERS VALUATION was not accepted as proof of value, please see A again please. There were replies to defendants legal department [A2 –A10] and [A11] to defendants customer service. Can i refer to A5, where the issue of the Ebay sale not acceptable and i had sent [A12 A13] CALLED 5 a b in A5 TO LEGAL DEPARTMENT. This is expanded further in [A8] ,,,,,,,,,,,,,AUCTIONEERS VALUATION WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ,,,,,,,,,,5ab emailed to defendants however defendants will not pay claim although auctioneers valuation supplied. From [A9] ,,CLAIM 3 AUCTIONEERS VALUATION SUPPLIED HOWEVER WILL STILL NOT PAY CLAIM. FORCEING ME INTO LITAGATION. In letter to customer service, [A11] again issues explained,,,,,,,,,,this was issue before the court, THE EBAY SALE UNDER 7.4 AUCTIONEERS VALUATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. In [A12 A13 ] you have again a Ebay print out claiming under an AUCTIONEERS VALUATION WHICH IS REJECTED BY THE COURT AS NOT PROF OF VALUE.
THIS WAS ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IN OBS08441.
Can i digress to explain next part, in claim form for claim 1 OBS08441 i state ,,,,,,,,,,,i contact defendants and they replied on the 29.7.2010, can i show reply [A14], WHERE IT QUOTES THEIR REFERENCE NUMBER. In claim 2 as explained above sent to appeal department, defendants had to pay claim, cancelled cheque as now a court hearing, AND THEN ,,,,,,,,,WE WILL SAY ANY NONSENSE TO YOU OR THE COURT TO REJECT YOUR CLAIMS ,,,,,,,,,,,,,SAY WE CAN NOT TRACE OUR REFERENCE NUMBERS. A court order to produce and my reply to defendants/court in [ A15 –A18]. The reply to court order in A18.
So we come to hearing , clear what issue is from above. D J Watson concluded correctly an issue over proof of value. He tries to start over proof of value however stopped by defendants as [A18] claimed as from a theoretical LEGAL point of view i had breached court order [A15]. As DJ Watson said true, but someone acting in person a very, very good effort , and defendants had no chance if they should appeal his judgement. He then tries to go back to issue before the court, PROOF OF VALUE ,,where he is stopped again,,,,,,,,,,,there is no need to look at proof of value as even if you find for Mr Jones we can not pay claim via our regulations 51.4 [A16] AS WE CAN NOT PAY FOR VALUABLES. I KNEW FROM CASE IN 2003 NOT VALUABLES,,,,,,,,,,,,AS DJ SAID IN SETTING CASE TO DEFENDANTS THESE ARE NOT JEWELLERY OR MONEY AS YOUR CLASSIFICATION VALUABLES. THESE ARE DEFINED AGAIN FROM OBS08441 DEFENDANTS BUNDLE [A17]
SO THEY KNEW MY CLAIM NOT VALUABLES. THIS WAS JUST PERJURY TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE.
SO WE MOVE ON AT LAST TO A EBAY SALE BEING USED AS PROFF OF VALUE VIA DEFENDANTS REGULATIONS 7.4 ,,,,,,AN AUCTIONEERS VALUATION AND THIS IS ACCEPTED BY THE COURT.
THIS IS SAME ISSUE TODAY CAN I QUOTE FROM LORD BINGHAM SAID ,,,,AN ATTEMPT TO RELITAGATE IN ANOTHER ACTION ISSUES WHICH HAVE BEEN FULLY INVESTIGATED AND DECIDED IN A FORMER ACTION MAY CONSTITUENT AN ABUSE OF PROCESS , CAN I REFER TO WHAT STUART –SMITH L J AID IN JOHNSTONE V GOREWOOD 2000,,,,,,,,,,,,,WHERE CONCERN OVER THE JUDICIAL PROCESS BEING BOUGHT INTO DISREPUTE WHERE ONE COURT COULD FIND A DIFFERENT VERDICT TO A PREVIOUS ONE. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,HE STATES,,,,,,,,PUBLIC POLICY REQUIRES THERE SHOULD BE AN END TO LITAGATION AND THAT A LITAGENT SHOULD NOT BE VEXED AGAIN IN THE SAME CAUSE.
This is exactly what this is , a vexious application to relitagate OBS08441. Its EXACTLY THE SAME A CLAIM FROM A EBAY SALE BEING USED AS PROOF OF VALUE UNDER 7.4..........AN AUCTIONEERS VALUATION.
BRISTOL COUNTY COURT CASE NUMBER
PLAINTIFF PHILIP JONES
DEFENDANTS ROYAL MAIL
PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
1/ A claim was made on the ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and rejected on the,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,claim number,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
2/ The basis of claim is shown on reverse , copy of the claim form, copied for defendants with claim form as defendants have alleged claim forms illegible, however for example saying your name and where sent not legible, however quote this data rejecting claim , ask for scan of claim form and then put in a different claim to pervert the course of justice, in their previous rejection letter. . The defendants have said we will write any nonsense to reject your claims, if you want compensation go to court.
PLAINTIFF DATE
COPY OF CLAIM FORM AS PREVIOUS ALLEGATIONS THAT CLAIM FORM NOT LEGIBLE HOWEVER FOR EXAMPLE YOU HAVE QUOTED MY NAME/ADDRESS AND WHERE SENT AND THEN CLAIM DATA ILLEGIBLE IN REJECTING CLAIM IF YOU MAINTAIN CLAIM FORM DATA ILLEGIBLE CAN YOU PLEASE AMEND CLAIM FORM AS AGREEMENT YOUR LETTER DATED 8.8.2010
MY NAME ADDRESS MR PHILIP JONES 31 BIBURY AVE BRISTOL BS346DF 01454614420 PHILIP.JONES88@BTINTERNET.COM
SENT TO
FIRST CLASS ABOUT MIDDAY POSTED DATE,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,POSTAGE PAID,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,POSTED AT .....................POSTOFFICE IN ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
ITEM DESCRIPTION
IN TERMS OF YOUR REGULATIONS SECTION 7.4 COMPENSATION ENCLOSED ONE OF FOLLOWING AS PROFF OF VALUE
ORGINAL RECEIPT
PAYPAL INVOICE
AUCTION VALUATION WHERE FROM OXFORD DICTIONARY AN AUCTION DEFINED ,,,,,,,,,,,,,PUBLIC SALE WHERE ARTICLES SOLD TO HIGHEST BIDDER
LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE
IF ANY DATA NOT CLEAR IT SHOULD BE SPECIFICALLY CLARIFIED IN YOUR REJECTION LETTER AS YOUR REPLY MAY BE USED IN COURT HEARING
P JONES DATE AS CLAIM FORM
HEARING OF OBS08441 INITIAL CONSIDERATION BEFORE HEARING
1/ I already have a selected file which may be of little relevance as we have no defence. I do not know what allegations will be made. I have asked numerous times for the court to allow amendments to claims, for example POC to claim 3 is a nonsense, and for the court to order defendants to file a defence. If required i have documents with court stamp, for example latest stamped 19.8.2011 where DJ Daniels the court informs me returned with,,,,no comment to make. THE COURT KNOWS CLAIM 3 IS A NONSENSE AND THE COURT IS PREAPARED TO HEAR CASE WITH NO DEFENCE. This is in clear breach of a fair trial, can i quote from Stuart v Goldberg [2008] where it was unfair to keep evidence upyour sleeve, hoping to get an advantage at trial. From a claim i was involved in i was reprimanded for only sending witness statement a week before hearing, as unfair as defendants could be caught by surprise.
2/ I have made an application for adjournment so a defence can be formed.The court inform it will be dealt with at start of hearing.
3/ Case 1 and 2 defendants have presented no documents for hearing. It could be the only thing they will contest as they have since paid claim that interest as county court rules should not be paid. I do not know what defence is they could be defending the whole claim, i do not know you do not know. The claim was rejected as proff of value not acceptable. The document i produced was from an auction where auctioneer had put reserve of 40.00. From defendants booklet on file an auctioneers valuation is acceptable. Case 3 , the POC is a nonsense. Claim rejected now claim form arrived as proff of value not acceptable, i will show claim form can be amended , which it was from an Ebay auction were 4 people bid an amount more than my claim.
4/ I do not know what defence is which is utterly unfair until you ask defendants, reason for request for adjournment
P JONES
31 Bibury Ave
Bristol
BS346DF
18.8.2011
CASE NUMBER 0BS08441
1/ With reference to court hearing, i might as well collect leave to appeal papers as i bring by hand this letter to be stamped as primary FIRST part of documents for leave to appeal/court hearing in October. .
2/ The defendants state we can not produce a defence as claims unknown. This is nonsense , has no merit for example after POC issued , defendants send case 2 to one of defendants non legal appeal departments , TO CONFIRM THEY WERE CORRECT so they could do a defence, who found AGAINST defendants and told them to pay claim, SO EVEN DEFENDANTS APPEAL SECTION SAY CLAIM SHOULD BE PAID , which they have done less interest as county court rules. SO FULLY AWARE OF CLAIM . THEN 2 WEEKS LATER AFTER PAYING CLAIM INFORM YOU ,,,,WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOUR CLAIMING FOR WHICH ,,,,,,,,,,,,,THEY HAD EVEN PAID CLAIM [we have no defence , defendants say RECENTLY although our OWN appeal d department found against legal department the cheque cancelled as we will not pay interest] I WILL USE AT HEARING EMAIL WHERE IT WAS CLEAR IF NOT PAID IN 28 DAYS A SUMMONS WOULD BE ISSUED.
PLAYING DEVILS ADVOCATE IS THE DEFENCE FOR EXAMPLE ,,,,WE MIXED UP ISSUE OUR OTHER APPEAL DEPARTMENT SAID WE WERE CORRECT WE APOLOGISE SENDING LETTER/CHEQUE AFTER YOU ISSUED THE POC SAYING OUR APPEAL DEPARTMENT FOUND FOR PLAINTIFF. I DID NOT ASK FOR APPEAL THE DEFENDANTS SENT TO CONFIRM THEY WERE CORRECT
CAN THE COURT CONFIRM THE DEFENDANTS CAN TAKE THIS MATTER TO COURT WITHOUT PRODUCING A DEFENCE TO CLAIMS . SO THEY CAN PRODUCE ANY DEFENCE NONSENSE WHICH I AM UNAWARE OF ,UNTIL HEARING ,,,,,,,,,CLEAR REASON FOR SEEKING AN APPEAL
3/ As in Stuart v Goldberg [2008] i have informed the court and defendants that claim 3 is such that WE HAVE A NEW CLAIM , POC requires amending , additional/removal part claim, as facts of case were unknown when the POC was issued.
I MAKE IT ABUNDANTLY CLEAR TO THE COURT THAT CLAIM IS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT TO ONE IN THE POC . I HAVE INFORMED THE COURT OF THIS IN PREVIOUS CORRESPONDENCE AS CITED IN STUART ET AL DIRECTIONS. I TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DEFENCE,,,,,,,,WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOUR CLAIMING FOR. ITS NOT AS THE POC AS FROM STUART THE COURT ASKED FOR CARDS TO BE PUT ON THE TABLE FOR THE COURT TO DECIDE IF ONE OR 2 HEARINGS ARE REQUIRED. I REFER TO MY CORRESPONDENCE WHERE I INFORMED THE COURT THAT CLAIM 3 REQUIRED TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY AMENDED OR REMOVED TO BE SERVED AT A LATER DATE WITH CORRECT DATA FOR CLAIM. FROM STUART THE COURT TO DIRECT IF 1 OR 2 TRIALS ARE REQUIRED. IF YOU WANT ONE TRIAL POC REQUIRES AMENDING
THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE RAISED THE ISSUE. I WILL ASSUME THE AMENDED CLAIM WILL BE HEARD ALTHOUGH THE POC IS NOT CORRECT .
I WILL NOT BE CLAIMING CLAIM 3 AS THE POC BUT ON FACTS PRODUCED CITED FOR THE COURT IN PREVIOUS CORRESPONDENCE AS FULL FACTS UNKNOWN WHEN THE POC WAS ISSUED.
CAN THE COURT CONFIRM THAT IT WILL HEAR CLAIM 3 ON FACTS PRODUCED IN CORRESPONDENCE AND NOT ON ISSUED POC. EG THE COURT WILL NOT ALLOW CLAIM 3 TO BE AMENDED OR REMOVED TO BE SERVED PROPERLY WITH CORRECT FACTS IN A LATER CLAIM EG AS STUART ET AL IF I OR 2 TRIALS ARE REQUIRED
P JONES